About – Don’t Marry Career Women
Guys: A word of advice. Marry pretty women or ugly ones. Short ones or tall ones. Blondes or brunettes. Just, whatever you do, don’t marry a woman with a career.
Why? Because if many social scientists are to be believed, you run a higher risk of having a rocky marriage. While everyone knows that marriage can be stressful, recent studies have found professional women are more likely to get divorced, more likely to cheat, less likely to have children, and, if they do have kids, they are more likely to be unhappy about it. A recent study in Social Forces, a research journal, found that women–even those with a “feminist” outlook–are happier when their husband is the primary breadwinner.
Not a happy conclusion, especially given that many men, particularly successful men, are attracted to women with similar goals and aspirations. And why not? After all, your typical career girl is well-educated, ambitious, informed and engaged. All seemingly good things, right? Sure…at least until you get married. Then, to put it bluntly, the more successful she is the more likely she is to grow dissatisfied with you. Sound familiar?
Many factors contribute to a stable marriage, including the marital status of your spouse’s parents (folks with divorced parents are significantly more likely to get divorced themselves), age at first marriage, race, religious beliefs and socio-economic status. And, of course, many working women are indeed happily and fruitfully married–it’s just that they are less likely to be so than non-working women. And that, statistically speaking, is the rub.
To be clear, we’re not talking about a high-school dropout minding a cash register. For our purposes, a “career girl” has a university-level (or higher) education, works more than 35 hours a week outside the home and makes more than $30,000 a year.
If a host of studies are to be believed, marrying these women is asking for trouble. If they quit their jobs and stay home with the kids, they will be unhappy ( Journal of Marriage and Family, 2003). They will be unhappy if they make more money than you do ( Social Forces, 2006). You will be unhappy if they make more money than you do ( Journal of Marriage and Family, 2001). You will be more likely to fall ill ( American Journal of Sociology). Even your house will be dirtier ( Institute for Social Research).
Why? Well, despite the fact that the link between work, women and divorce rates is complex and controversial, much of the reasoning is based on a lot of economic theory and a bit of common sense. In classic economics, a marriage is, at least in part, an exercise in labor specialization. Traditionally men have tended to do “market” or paid work outside the home and women have tended to do “non-market” or household work, including raising children. All of the work must get done by somebody, and this pairing, regardless of who is in the home and who is outside the home, accomplishes that goal. Nobel laureate Gary S. Becker argued that when the labor specialization in a marriage decreases–if, for example, both spouses have careers–the overall value of the marriage is lower for both partners because less of the total needed work is getting done, making life harder for both partners and divorce more likely. And, indeed, empirical studies have concluded just that.
In 2004, John H. Johnson examined data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and concluded that gender has a significant influence on the relationship between work hours and increases in the probability of divorce. Women’s work hours consistently increase divorce, whereas increases in men’s work hours often have no statistical effect. “I also find that the incidence in divorce is far higher in couples where both spouses are working than in couples where only one spouse is employed,” Johnson says. A few other studies, which have focused on employment (as opposed to working hours) have concluded that working outside the home actually increases marital stability, at least when the marriage is a happy one. But even in these studies, wives’ employment does correlate positively to divorce rates, when the marriage is of “low marital quality.”
The other reason a career can hurt a marriage will be obvious to anyone who has seen their mate run off with a co-worker: When your spouse works outside the home, chances increase they’ll meet someone they like more than you. “The work environment provides a host of potential partners,” researcher Adrian J. Blow reported in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, “and individuals frequently find themselves spending a great deal of time with these individuals.”
There’s more: According to a wide-ranging review of the published literature, highly educated people are more likely to have had extra-marital sex (those with graduate degrees are 1.75 more likely to have cheated than those with high school diplomas.) Additionally, individuals who earn more than $30,000 a year are more likely to cheat.
And if the cheating leads to divorce, you’re really in trouble. Divorce has been positively correlated with higher rates of alcoholism, clinical depression and suicide. Other studies have associated divorce with increased rates of cancer, stroke, and sexually-transmitted disease. Plus divorce is financially devastating. According to one recent study on “Marriage and Divorce’s Impact on Wealth,” published in The Journal of Sociology, divorced people see their overall net worth drop an average of 77%.
So why not just stay single? Because, academically speaking, a solid marriage has a host of benefits beyond just individual “happiness.” There are broader social and health implications as well. According to a 2004 paper entitled “What Do Social Scientists Know About the Benefits of Marriage?” marriage is positively associated with “better outcomes for children under most circumstances,” higher earnings for adult men, and “being married and being in a satisfying marriage are positively associated with health and negatively associated with mortality.” In other words, a good marriage is associated with a higher income, a longer, healthier life and better-adjusted kids.
A word of caution, though: As with any social scientific study, it’s important not to confuse correlation with causation. In other words, just because married folks are healthier than single people, it doesn’t mean that marriage is causing the health gains. It could just be that healthier people are more likely to be married.
1. You are less likely to get married to her.
So say Lee A. Lillard and Linda J. Waite of the University of Michigan’s Michigan Retirement Research Center. In a paper, “Marriage, Divorce and the Work and Earnings Careers of Spouses”, published in April, 2000, they found that for white women, higher earnings, more hours of employment and higher wages while single all reduce the chances of marriage. “This suggests that (1) success in the labor market makes it harder for women to make a marital match, (2) women with relatively high wages and earnings search less intensively for a match, or (3) successful women have higher standards for an acceptable match than women who work less and earn less.” Some research suggests the opposite is true for black women.
Source: “Marriage, Divorce and the Work and Earnings Careers of Spouses,” Lee A. Lillard, Linda J. Waite, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center, Working Papers, April, 2000.
2. If you do marry, you are more likely to get divorced.
In 2004, John H. Johnson examined data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and concluded that gender has a significant influence on the relationship between work hours and increases in the probability of divorce. Women’s work hours consistently increase divorce, whereas increases in men’s work hours often have no statistical effect. “I also find that the incidence in divorce is far higher in couples where both spouses are working than in couples where only one spouse is employed,” Johnson said. A few other studies, which have focused on employment (as opposed to working hours) have concluded that working outside the home actually increases marital stability, at least when the marriage is a happy one. But even in these studies, wives’ employment does correlate positively to divorce rates, when the marriage is of “low marital quality.”
Sources: “A Treatise On The Family,” Gary S. Becker, Harvard University Press, 1981; “Do Long Work Hours Contribute To Divorce?” John H. Johnson, Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 2004; “Wives’ Employment and Spouses’ Marital Happiness,” Robert Schoen, Stacy J. Rogers, Paul R. Amato, Journal of Family Issues, April 2006.
3. She is more likely to cheat on you.
According to a wide-ranging review of the published literature, highly educated people are more likely to have had extra-marital sex (those with graduate degrees are 1.75 more likely to have cheated than those with high school diplomas.) One April, 2005 study, by Adrian J. Blow for the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy summed it up: “If a woman has more education than her partner, she is more likely to have a sexual relationship outside of her primary relationship; if her husband has more education, she is less likely to engage in infidelity.” Additionally individuals who earn more than $30,000 a year are more likely to cheat. “In a more general sense, it appears that employment has significantly influenced infidelity over the years,” Blow said. “The work environment provides a host of potential partners, and individuals frequently find themselves spending a great deal of time with these individuals.”
Source: “Infidelity in Committed Relationships II: A Substantive Review,” Adrian J. Blow, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, April 2005.
4. You are much less likely to have kids.
According to the National Marriage Project, the incidence of childlessness is growing across the socioeconomic scale. In 2004, 20% of women over 40 remained childless. Thirty years ago that figure was 10%. But the problem–and it is a problem because the vast majority of women desire children–is much more extreme for career women. According to Sylvia Ann Hewlett, an economist and the author of Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children, only 51% of ultra-achieving women (those earning more than $100,000 a year) have had children by age 40. Among comparable men, the figure was 81%. A third of less successful working women (earning either $55,000 or $65,000) were also childless at age 40.
Sources: The State of Our Unions 2006: Life Without Children, The National Marriage Project, July 2006. Creating a Life: Professional Women and the Quest for Children, Sylvia Ann Hewlett, Miramax Books, 2002.
5. If you do have kids, your wife is more likely to be unhappy.
A 2003 study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family concluded that wealthier couples with children suffer a drop in marital satisfaction three times as great as their less affluent peers. One of the study’s co-authors publicly speculated that the reason is that wealthier women are used to “a professional life, a fun, active, entertaining life.”
Sources: “Parenthood and Martial Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Jean M. Twenge, W. Keith Campbell, and Craig A. Foster, Journal of Marriage and Family, 2003; “Money doesn’t mean happy parenting,” USA Today, July 21, 2003.
6. Your house will be dirtier.
In 2005, two University of Michigan scientists concluded that if your wife has a job earning more than $15 an hour (roughly $30,000 a year), she will do 1.9 hours less housework a week. Of course, this can be solved if the husband picks up a broom.
Source: “Data Quality of Housework Hours in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Who Really Does The Dishes?”, Alexandra C. Achen and Frank P. Stafford, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, September 2005.
7. You’ll be unhappy if she makes more than you.
You aren’t going to like it if she makes more than you do: “Married men’s well-being is significantly lower when married women’s proportional contributions to the total family income are increased.”
Source: “Changes in Wives’ Income: Effects on Marital Happiness, Psychological Well-Being, and the Risk of Divorce,” Stacy J. Rogers, Danelle D. DeBoer, Journal of Marriage and Family, May 2001
8. She will be unhappy if she makes more than you.
According to the authors of a controversial 2006 study: “American wives, even wives who hold more feminist views about working women and the division of household tasks, are typically happier when their husband earns 68% or more of the household income.” Reason? “Husbands who are successful breadwinners probably give their wives the opportunity to make more choices about work and family–e.g., working part-time, staying home, or pursuing a meaningful but not particularly remunerative job.”
Sources: What’s Love Got To Do With It? W. Bradford Wilcox, Steven L. Nock, Social Forces, March, 2006; http://www.happiestwives.org.
9. You are more likely to fall ill.
A 2001 study found that having a wife who works less than 40 hours a week has no impact on your health, but having a wife who works more than 40 hours a week has “substantial, statistically significant, negative effects on changes in her husband’s health over that time span.” The author of another study summarizes that “wives working longer hours not do not have adequate time to monitor their husband’s health and healthy behavior, to manage their husband’s emotional well-being or buffer his workplace stress.”
Sources: “It’s About Time and Gender: Spousal Employment and Health,” Ross M. Stolzenberg, American Journal of Sociology, July, 2001; “Marriage, Divorce and the Work and Earnings Careers of Spouses,” Lee A. Lillard, Linda J. Waite, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center, Working Papers, April, 2000.
Any man who thinks this way has low self esteem and does not deserve to marry a sexy, intelligent woman.
Get ready for your future divorce, it’ll be coming real soon. If anything, it’s career women with low self esteem since they’re the ones so desperate to prove themselves they’ll sacrifice anything to be as successful as men in the work place, even though they never will be.
This article hits it home. There’s no need for two primary breadwinners, that just leaves a lot other things unattended to. You can live in a fantasy world if you want, but that’s the reason divorce rates are so high. Throughout our evolutionary history women have had more “domestic” roles whereas men have been the providers.
Wait until they outsource you and you’ll see why men now want working women. America is no longer at the top and our country is falling apart. I work and my husband and I are solidly middle class and we will be retiring earlier. There is no way to be middle class and in a global economy on 1 paycheck.
I have news for you. This article is based totally on facts, regardless of how men think. It’s a fact that career women are a burden on their families.
I have some more news for you. Men do not only look for “sexy, intelligent women” to marry. Actually those traits are usually at the bottom of the list. Most importantly they want a woman DEVOTED to her family, unlike career women. If they were looking only for a “sexy, intelligent woman”, they can find them real cheap in the red-light district, no need to marry them.
men want it all: they want the wife at home and sluts on the side. and expect their wives to put up with it.
You’re a fucking idiot and you keep proving it with every post.
No where in human history have men in general EVER claimed “Men want is all.” It’s moron Feminists (redundant) that made this a Mantra. So you’re THAT fucking stupid? Seriously? You’re that stupid you don’t even know a Feminist Mantra. Use Google you dumb bitch! Type in “Women Want it All” and you’ll get nearly 271,000,000 hits. The top hits will be articles.
You’re a total fucking idiot. You really are.
Gawd I can only imagine how many U.S. parents with grown up daughters are so pi**ed off with their daughter/daughters, hurt, and down right furious with their so selfish daughters. I can also just imagine how embarrassed a lot of U.S. parents are with their daughters these days with the me me me, just give me give me give me attitude.
Gawd it must absolutely SUCK for a lot of U.S. women these days going home for holidays knowing that it’s going to most likely end up with fighting, arguing, pi**ed off parents cause so many U.S. women are so selfish, rebel when their parents start constantly nagging them when are they going to get married, when is she going to bring home a “decent” guy, when are you going to start your family. A lot of you U.S. ladies must enjoy CRUSHING their parents dream of having grandchildren and just must love being selfish B**CHES!!! One of these days for a lot of these selfish women karma’s going to come back and bight you in the a**es and then you will start crying, bi*ching, crawling back pleading for forgiveness. Why the h*ll should us men even attempt to remotely forgive a lot of you ladies that act like this?? You ladies like this brought it all onto yourselves.
Women are not broodmares. Any parent that truly love and respected their daughter(s) would accept her for how she is and what she believed. If she chooses to remain single, and even childfree, that is her business. If her parents can’t accept that, then maybe she needs to put distance between herself and her parents.
It’s not selfish to remain single and/or childfree. What’s selfish is trying to force your values and lifestyle on another person, especially if that person wants something different.
It isn’t a daughter’s “responsibility” to provide grandchildren. It is her life and her body. As she will be the one raising those kids, it is her choice whether or no to have kids. Having children is a life altering decision, a decision that should never be made in haste or under pressure, especially from potential grandparents.
Women in the West can’t even have a fully functioning Vagina. They (i.e. YOU) are so fucking stupid it affects their Vagina. Animals can figure out how to reproduce but Women in the West can’t. It’s not only Selfish, it’s Suicidal.
Although, considering how batshit women it is comforting to know they’re murdering their children and remaining barren lunatics.
My sons are giving me more work than my daughters. They only want to goof off and not do their school work. They want to take forever to grow up into men. My daughters already are in colleges with scholarships. My husband is very frustrated with them because they are lazy and keep expecting us to put up with them when they goof off. They dont understand that if they drop the ball, they are hurting their families and wives. They dont see that America isnt as rich as it used to be and now there are less jobs for them. Other more mature men will get the jobs and not them. My sons are giving me more work than my daughters. My husband is very hard working and came from a third world country (Pakistan, not muslim) and our two boys are nothing like him or me. They just want to goof off which is what the patriarchy is now teaching boys/men (and women to be sluts). My neighbor also mentioned her son just wants to sleep around but her 2 daughters (both done with colleges) want to settle down. Its not easy turning a boy into a man. Girls mature faster and know the consequences of their mistakes. They work harder so their kids will have better. My sons give us more work and we fight more over them than the girls. My eldest we found out was skipping school for over a month!
It’s because you’re such a piece of shit Feminist twat. If you sons learn anything it will be to hate you as much as you hate men, and to hate all Feminists. If your sons do anything worthy of being a man they’ll disown you, fuck like rabbits, and have a litter of home-schooled children that shit on the Koran daily and dump it on their Hippy Grandma’s porch in a flaming bag.
The biggest backlash against feminism actually seems to be coming from the sons of feminists.
Military, police officer, firefighter, or any other male-dominated job. Those are the worst jobs for women and I heard that’s where women are more likely to cheat because they are surrounded by other men. Also if a man stays home and/or earns little to none, the pool of women declines because the man is supposed to be the breadwinner.
I think that there is one thing missing. Women like security. I think that this is a given. But there is a quote that says “be careful what you become in the process of getting what you want. ” The word no one is using is predator. They become experts at being able to assess a man and find his weak spot or find if a man has money or not. And then even if you have money you become a stepping stone until they find a richer man. I think that men brought this on themselves because they didn’t wont to learn enough about women to really be their friends, just sex objects, so women decided all men were losers and they might as well take the richest. Too bad it isn’t just this simple. 50-60% of women are sexually abused as children and only 5% ever get counseling. Yea that’s right they don’t like men and it’s 40% for men. Just a bad situation…..They don’t have divorce in the Philippines…6years for cheating and up to life for prostitution. It’s the most beautiful place in the world too, if you like beaches
Very nice article and true. Though I would say its always better to have an educated woman who choose to stay home and take care of kids.
Most educated women do choose to stay home but others know they are being played and losing their careers. Kids also bore intelligent people. Kids also dont need parents round the clock. Its not quantity but quality. Real feminists are not falling for any trick men use. Even well educated she will not stay home and be a slave to the house, kids or husband and lose her dream/independance in life. If you were a woman, what would you do? Would you put up with brats for 20 years and lose your career? Try seeing it from an intelligent woman’s perspective and you’ll understand how a feminist feels and thinks. And if you were a stay at home mom, which man would you want a plumber or a doctor?
If women were allowed to have a career more than decade ago then divorce wouldn’t be such big deal. In the past decades women were trapped in their marriage without being able to make decision for their family. Back in the old days and even today some women and their children are mistreated by their drunken, abusive, cheater husbands. Today is a great deal that women should have careers not only to be able to leave a bad marriage but to also help her family to stay together. Women that have a career can gain money support not only her children but also her marriage when money is little, or husband is sick or dead
YOu’re so very incorrect. People caught in the “gender war” are totally in the dark.
Feminism is ZIONISM. It is not for women. Women are temporary TOOLS to be discarded once the goal is accomplished.
this is FACT for any historian. Research the Jewish Zionist Bolshevik overthrow of Russian Monarchy, and its plunge into darkness, destruction and devoid of Christian values.. under Soviet (Bolshevik aka Rothschild Zionist Jewry) control.. the millions murdered in Gulags.
Look at Russian women today… at the bottom of the heap, far worse than where they were.
Women cannot SURVIVE on the backs of men which they do, while proclaiming independence. Its hogwash.
Let this run its course. Its coming very close to the end for these useless stupid females who will be sacrificed in droves. Women will no longer have the protection of men. They will die by the millions helpless under a tyrannical regime.
History repeats itself. Global Zionism is the real enemy.
Women like you are uneducated buffoons who believe in the toof fairy.. as in you actually believe WOMEN created FEMINISM. NO, they did not. Nor did they fund it. Nor have they run it. Nor can they run it. All they can do is CHOOSE to participate or not. If they live outside their husband’s means they are participating and will end up FODDER, as a tool to be used and discarded by the State.
Keep watching you freaking idiot. We are coming very close now to the end game. Bank collapses globally, the start of WW3, massive inflation, food shortages, military martial law… a very very harsh condition to live under where women , the weaker sex and less capable of surviging the physical hardships of the real world.. will suddenly wake the hell up and realize their folly.. that they were duped, Because now they will not survive on their own without men. Feminism at least in its theory is a joke and never works. Women are manipulative, Men have to keep them in check. They don’t understand laws or boundaries. Women do not use logic. They are a dangerous gender when it comes to maintainng law and order.
Men are in revolt. Soon it will get louder. Then violent.
Tell me dear.. do you want hand to hand combat with men ? This is where gender war is going. Toward physical violence, a place where women have used a totalitarian law/order put in place by Zionists to hold it all in check.. eventually that fails and the damn breaks and the male energy which has been pent up and held back like the water against the damn, explodes and women will be the victims of massive violent retalation…
Just imagine. MALE COPS raping women, not reporting incidents, not responding to incidents, working with male judges… working aginst females in the sytem, murdering them, shutting them up, forcing them out, bullying them into submission.. common criminals on the streets, raping and killing women.. and nobody to protect them. Now you understand what other societies live with… and when the bankers collapse this country MEN BUILT to PRESERVE LIBERTY, then chaos ensues and women are going to find out what their stupid little “independence” rants amount to…
Just plain stupid. If I was a tiny woman with a vagina I would never imagine I”m a man’s equal. I would want his protection and love and not to perish in this world a total fool.
One can only hope your public gang raping is on YouTube for all posterity to amuse themself with…
Women operate on a system of biological defaults of survival that makes them manipulative and controlling, and men operate on another fundamental survival skills. They are not equal. Opposites.
Let’s go to war and get this over with. Men will slaughter women in droves in days… its only their GUILT over having such POWER that holds it in check.. not your fucking mouths or your cunts.. its our GRACE that we love and care and will protect you from the harshness of the environment, wild animals that kill for food, and other men who wish to use you to produce their progeny.That is the ONLY REASON you are alive.
In many societies they just kill the baby girls and I see a resurgance of that.
You are watching the END of FEMINISM and the RISE of RETALIATION and VIOLENT BACKLASH of the male gender. Keep on watching sweetie… its building, its invevitable and its already happened in Russia. Ask anyone from that country.
the women end up sold like slaves… once all men in all of society no longer want to take care of them.
YOU are DELUSIONAL. Come here so I can punch you in the face and show you how your head bouncing off the sidewalk does not make for a pretty sight. Knocking out a feminist is becoming a sport.
You are a true retard. U must be be the the biggest delusional, degenerate uneducated fuck I have ever encountered on the internet,
Your are right, women can only evolve in secured environment, the future will be very harsh for the sweeties… You can add also when the Gov and Corps will stop promoting women because it will cost to much.
That was the most informed rant I’ve read on the net in 15 years. You nailed it.
Lots and lots of b….s…t!!!!!! If the sex is great the marriage will work, but if it’s not it will end the relationship…..
I wish I could say that was the biggest piece of bullshit I’ve read for a long time, but sadly you’re not alone in your incredibly privileged sexist crap of a viewpoint. Here’s something you may have not considered: if we accept that men are more likely to be unhappy when their wives earn more, it’s because they have been brought up in a patriarchal society that conditions them to believe they MUST be the real breadwinner of the family, which is so not fair to anyone, man or woman. So then, if the woman is unhappy with her higher salary compared to her husbands’, perhaps this has something to do with the same ingrained concept that has been pressed upon her, as well? In other news, water is fucking wet. The statistics you quote do not support your argument and you’re an asshole.
Stay at home wives love to attack career women because they know they will live off of their husband’s child support checks and alimony if the marriage ends or welfare if the man doesn’t have money. They know the government will force their husbands to take care of them or the state will take care of them. Men typically go running to career women with incomes after they’ve been taken to the cleaners by their stay at home ex-wives.
Then their wife dumps them when they lose money and goes for a richer man.
Careers in which women are most likely to cheat:
1) Military
2) Police
3) Firefighter
4) Multilingual Interpreter
5) Tour Guide
6) Model
7) Actress
8) Dancer
9) TV Journalist
10) Photographer
11) Filmmaker
12) Computers
13) Artist
14) Designer
15) Bartender
16) Singer
17) Manager
Anything that involves a lot of men around on average, such as being a soldier, cop, or firefighter, for example, yes women are most likely to cheat on their husbands. Even multilingual women can easily be tempted to cheat on their husbands with foreign men. Foreign men are always depicted as wife stealers, or home wreckers.
i consider the author of this article, as well as anyone who agrees with it, sexist idiots! A man is more likely to cheat if he works too (how many men have affairs with their secretaries??) so does that mean he should stay at home too????? This is just another pig that believes women should stick with the traditional role of cooking, cleaning, and caring for kids. The only reason you want a woman like this is because they are easier to control. Well guess what! A smart woman would tell you to kiss her a$$ because you are full of $hit. you should have been born 100 years ago if you want to live like that. Any woman who would be with a man like this needs to learn about a little thing called self-respect!!
On the contrary, there are many women who would want nothing more than to be a traditional housewife that raises young and does wifely things as long as their husband was a good provider and was faithful. Feminism, I would hope, isnt meant to force females to be career oriented but rather to let them have the choice to be career oriented if they desired. You are implying being a housewife(even by choice) is somehow degrading or backwards for women.
Also, not all men who look for housewives are abusive and controlling.
The feminists on here who have shared their opinions (goofy as they are), have made clear their contempt for women who are not part of the workforce. They CLAIM we have “choices”, but really there is only one correct choice… being “liberated women” like them. But they are so angry I’m not sure how I’m supposed to interpret them as happy and free.
You’re fucking retarded.
So say The Angry Feminist.
Wow. I read some really beautiful things on here, especially the concepts of the Europeans and some really sad old fashioned thinking about women being sluts and not showing men proper “respect” and being accused of take take taking just because they enjoy their career. I am grateful to be American and not live in one of these ass backwards countries that have men that think like this. Well, if a fella doesnt want a career woman, that’s his choice although I am waiting for the follow-up article about how great paying alimony is.
Slutty women need to be spanked and then sent back to the kitchen to make that sandwich properly.
Yeah… I’m just trolling now. I can’t help it. Some of these manginas and feminists make it too easy.
You also forgot to mention the fashion, baubles & warpaint competition that is mandatory for professional women, not to mention the general cat fest presided over by the same old queen bees that goes on below the sisterly umbrella.
I wonder how much the results of the mentioned studies are due to correlation rather than causation. For example, one important distinction between educated, career women, and uneducated, stay at home moms: religiosity. Although the correlation between religiosity and education has been highly contestable, many studies have shown that educated individuals are less sure if there is a God(s), even if they attend places of worship at the same rate. For instance, a poll by Gallup indicates that, on average, 71% of postgraduates believe in God, while 88% of those with only a high school education or less believe in God. Link-http://www.gallup.com/poll/109108/belief-god-far-lower-western-us.aspx.
There are several other possible sources of correlation in this article. For example, the article mentions that career women are less likely to get married. Again is this because of their career or because of education? A simple regression line will show a strong negative correlation between years of education and average number of children, in the United States and countries around the world.
My reasoning for bringing this up is simple-the statistical differences between career women and stay at home moms could almost entirely be attributable to education and other extraneous variables. The studies mentioned in the article do not address this, and as a consequence, I think they should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
If you want to marry a woman who is happy to be a homemaker, don’t marry a career woman. If you don’t want to be a homemaker, don’t marry a man who is looking for a stay at home wife. It really comes down to what you are looking for in a relationship.
For every man with traditional views on a marriage and roles of men and women, there will be a woman that wants to take on the traditional housewife role. Similarly, for every career woman out there, there will be a man who doesn’t place emphasis on traditional roles and they too will have a happy marriage, based on what works for them.
All this talk of what works best is redundant. Every happy relationship is different and based on the desires and needs of the couple / family unit.
All you’re talking about here is your particular preference – some people like blondes, others prefer a red head. This comes down to personal preference and to be honest with you, I can’t imagine a situation where a man with traditional views, such as those displayed above, would ever be in a relationship with a career woman. It just wouldn’t happen, would it? So there is nothing to worry about. You’ll find a housewife, she’ll find a partner which is based on what works best.
Well do men want wives or slaves? It seems like men want slaves. Real women wont put up with being treated like crap and no one should be treated like crap. Men think its okay to treat women like crap but they would never accept it. Same with cheating. They love to do it but dont accept it. lol. Men with stay at home moms can afford to support a family on one income. I found this article extremely wrong, misogynistic and obviously written by a man who is a control freak. Real men want real women, not a slave. People with money and opportunities divorce because they can afford to. If your partner is unhappy and you limit them in every way, you are doing everything you can to keep them in an abusive unhappy marriage. Would men put up with the same if they had no careers, got stuck with house and kids and had no power over their lives or relationships? Of course not! But they expect women to out up with this. It goes to show how men want slaves for wives. This blog is misogynistic. You’re supposed to marry for love and do what is positive for your spouse and both are supposed to serve each other, not one does all the work(women) and the other does nothing(men). Marriages where both are committed are the happiest and most successful. Marriage has been proven to be better for men both in class and across cultures. My advice is to marry for love and respect your partner and support them, not limit them to house and kids. The man who wrote this blog is a control freak.
I worked in a women’s shelter and majority didnt have careers and their husband would abuse them. They didnt have any money or career to be independent and had no choice but to put up with the abuse. This is what this blog is teaching men. This is abusive to either gender if conditions apply.
What neanderthal with a small penis wrote this crap? I want actual measurements, because the “author” is obviously insecure about something.
Holy SHIT you’re fucking stupid!
See how easy that was?
That’s why the author included citations….so that the reader (i.e., you) can verify the facts.
I’m confused, from the main page of this website, reasons to not get married:
“If she stops working, she may never work again.”
“What motivation does the modern wife have to return to work? Very little. For several years now, the man’s salary has been enough to live on. Otherwise, she would have been working to make ends meet. Unless tight finances dictate that she must return to work, the husband really has little say in this matter.”
Get your fucking story straight.
the career women think that they are all that anyway, especially that so many of them do have a very serious attitude problem to begin with. certainly nothing like the real good old fashion down to earth women that we had years ago, and most of them did not cheat since they were very committed to their men that didn’t have that much money either.
woman fell victim to feminism which put them into the workforce to tax them…and to break up the family unit….who is raising little jonny today???
Then the banks love dumbed down woman who pay 100 grand for a useless liberal arts degree…imagine all the interest banks get if you can convince people to go into debt to get a degree…
A rubber stamp degree that sais that you are able to work for the man in the matrix system……..
Men are looking for good wives,girlfriends and mothers of their children….so your a banker,an astronaut,a business owner…..ooohhhh la lalalala so impressed…LOL
you are right absolutely. My divorce happened due to same reason.
I regret it.
regards
vinodh
Men and women were given God-designed roles to fulfill and function in the family. Women manage the household and should be in partnership with their husbands in training, raising and building up the lives of their children. Husbands are the key providers and protectors of their families. Women can still be creative and productive at home with home-based business to augment her husband’s income. With computerized technology and opportunities nowadays, wife can have creative and lucrative means of additional income at home to help her husband. Wives should be helpmates to their husbands not compete with them in terms of careers. That’s why one is the better half of the other. One is “bettered” by the help of the other and vice versa.