Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment


—————————————————–

Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
amanda2715

This blatant sexism can only be called sexual harassment. I am offended that a major publication would attempt to threaten women out of universities and corporate America with such tripe.

Even with a front page apology (expected 8/24/06), I can’t imagine a time when I will be able to stomach reading Forbes.

Nice work alienating half of the population Mr. Noer.

08-23-2006 04:38 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
jamielitt

amanda2715 wrote:
This blatant sexism can only be called sexual harassment. I am offended that a major publication would attempt to threaten women out of universities and corporate America with such tripe.

Even with a front page apology (expected 8/24/06), I can’t imagine a time when I will be able to stomach reading Forbes.

Nice work alienating half of the population Mr. Noer.

Amanda,

I COMPLETELY AGREE. I think we should file a class action suit against Forbes… as if it’s not HARD ENOUGH to find the man of our dreams who is our intellectual, emotional, and professional equal…now a magazine that they might read and trust on a daily basis is BLATANTLY TELLING those men NOT to marry us…but rather some moronic uneducated housewife (and although he says pretty OR ugly, we ALL know that if they can’t have someone with intellect and a personality, that they are going to straight for the ARM CANDY). So basically Pig Noer is encouraging men to marry a piece of gold-digging arm candy (because at under 30,000, you know she’s not buying her OWN manolos.)

I’m disgusted as well!

08-23-2006 04:52 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
jmurtell

I completely and wholeheartedly agree with everyone who has been offended by this article. It is profoundly backward, incorrectly assumptive, and filled with faulty logic.

Incidentially, who does the article target? I would love to see the author’s perception of these psychographics.

My company will be cancelling our three subscriptions immediately.

The multi-layers of wrongness in this article cannot go unnoticed.
Or unpunished.

It is an outrage.

08-23-2006 07:38 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
its2006Forbes

Agreed. Forbes has such a huge readership and advertisement sales area. It should not get away with this by posting an apology which costs nothing. After all, they are supposed to be running a business. and we al know business is about the cost of things and impact on revenue. They’d be SO glad to clean their hands of this just by saying sorry with a pout and sad doggie eyes because the females out there would just melt and forgive!

Forbes of all comapnies should pay for this!! How many steps back has this take the Forbes name brand?

Message Edited by its2006Forbes on 08-23-2006 08:17 PM

08-23-2006 08:01 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
amanda2715

First off, I’m shocked that the only people reporting this as ‘news’ are a few blogs. Looks like it’s time to start a list of companies that advertise with Forbes online and BOYCOT them.

Check out http://www.gawker.com. Apparently Mr. Noer is away from his desk this week…. at a wedding.

08-23-2006 10:14 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
grrlpower

right on sisters. noer should be considered persona non grata. we should all boycott forbes too for putting this tripe online.

08-24-2006 12:43 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
Back2TheKitchen

Don’t you love how the Feminists go crying to big daddy government when they feeeeel offended? Looking forward to the day when the FemNags don’t have the 800lb gorilla big daddy government there to back them up. Then we’ll see what they’re about.

You know you’re doing something right when the Feminists are screaming at you.

Great work Forbes! Keep it up!

The feminist double standard is there for everyone to see.

This article is tame compared to a typical issue of Cosmo, etc.
Or a Feminist blog ….

08-24-2006 10:34 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
Egghead

“Don’t you love how the Feminists go crying to big daddy government when they feeeeel offended? Looking forward to the day when the FemNags don’t have the 800lb gorilla big daddy government there to back them up. Then we’ll see what they’re about.”

Absolutely right! After all, the First Amendment only applies to the professional Vyctym class.

08-25-2006 12:58 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
PolishKnight

Pretty funny. How DARE forbes publish an article that career women are intolerant hostile harpies who make the rich career men of their dreams reject them because she might ream him in divorce court the second she doesn’t get what a princess like her demands…

08-25-2006 03:04 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
yohan

Amanda2715:
This blatant sexism can only be called sexual harassment.

I would call this baseless accusation against Mr. Noer, who did nothing but an excellent job a false rape allegation…. 🙂

08-26-2006 12:20 AM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
legacy42

Class action? You’re kidding me right? Such a frivolous suit would be tossed faster than you can say sine non quan. Get real and get a life. Men don’t want competitiors in their beds, they want supportive companions and you b*&%#@^s are not what men want and that infuriates you. Michael Noer is right and I am ordering a new subscription today.

08-27-2006 09:29 PM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
C2shiningC

Class-action lawsuit?? For being offended? hehe. You’re so cute!

As the old saying goes that liberals love repeating: “If you don’t like it, TURN THE PAGE!”

08-29-2006 02:58 AM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
Diogetrix

Same old lies, same old manipulations, same old belief that a fem can get away with any sophistry and any rudeness because there will always be a need or desire for her ass. Well, that works only when she is young and pretty, or when a society’s dynamics between men and women has made us trusting and mutually caring and respectful of one another. Feminist-lesbian extremism has destroyed that social relationship, and time has made that pretty ass pretty worthless. The only reason American women are not being attacked and murdered by the hundreds of thousands is the privilaged and protected role they have always enjoyed as part of the social contract – which feminist-lesbians have rejected. The most tragic story of the last fifty years is the story of each of the millions of men who were alienated from bed, home, and children. I don’t have much patience with the women who are still pretending to be victims. If I were young enough, I wouldn’t be fooled by the taunts and ridicule about “mail order brides;” I would be on a jet headed for another country.

08-30-2006 05:00 AM

—————————————————–

Re: Class Action Women V. Forbes: Sexual Harassment
khankrumthebulg

This is just a bunch of FemNags screaming that Some Male wrote an article based on peer reviewed studies done mostly by WOMEN. And probably Career Women at that. The Chickens are coming home to Roost. And Women are upset that there are consequences to the lies Feminists have been telling Women for years. That Men prefer agreeable, sweet, loving Companions to someone with the attitude of a Coiled Viper is not Rocket Science.

Maureen Dowd wrote a book complaining about what Garbage Men are for not Marrying her. And Gloria Steinem is whining about how horrible her life has been. What Women today fail to understand is what MEN WANT. They simply don’t care as everything in life is clearly about what THEY WANT. They are Narcissists who could care less about what someone else wants.

It has gotten so bad, Boomer Women are joining the Cougar Movement and paying for Sex with younger Third World Men. Heidi Fleiss is opening a Brothel for Women. So they can pay to have their “Itch” scratched. And the recent reauthorization of the VAWA included a rider criminalizing attempts by US Men to connect with Women overseas via the Internet.

How bad will it get Ladies? Ask your Empowered Sisters in New Zealand. A 35 year old Single New Zealand Woman has as much of a chance of getting married as a 85 year old Woman. The younger Men are voting with their feet and Kiwis are leaving their Nation.

08-30-2006 05:13 PM

—————————————————–

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: