Congratulations women


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Congratulations women

Congratulations women
Angelus
Contributor
Angelus
I see Forbes has just apologized for the Career women article.

Yet, they do not apologize for the Don’t Marry a Lazy Man article.

Thanks for proving our point for us.

Of course, it’s not about proving the point at all- you are just a bunch of Nazis who want to win by any means necessary. However, in your short-sightness, never let it be said that I didn’t warn you: You can’t win. This a classic example. You have just exposed your true nature and any man who isn’t deluded will see it. Those who don’t see it, I don’t want on my side.

You cannot stand an uncensored debate. Nevermind. I’m not interested in debating you, or talking with walls for instance. But men are waking up and will wake up. Remember. Once that happens, it’s GAME OVER. What will you do when all men realize the truth? What will you do? Censor their brains?

08-25-2006 07:46 PM

Re: Congratulations women
climber2
Contributor
climber2

So when all men think as women, the women will win.
Wow that’s deep.
But will we have to wear a one piece bathingsuit or a two piece?

08-25-2006 07:50 PM

Re: Congratulations women
Pelican
Regular Contributor
Pelican
Please provide a link to the “Lazy Man” article. Is it near the one that compares hookers and wives to Pepsi and Coke?

08-25-2006 07:56 PM

Re: Congratulations women
Angelus
Contributor
Angelus
Pelican- http://www.forbes.com/home/2006/08/23/Marriage-Careers-Divorce_cx_mn_land.html

As for climber- you get a two piece. So of course not all men, just not the manginas and I don’t want to point at anyone. We don’t need those.

08-25-2006 08:01 PM

Re: Congratulations women
Antiriad
Regular Contributor
Antiriad
They have won nothing. The sentiment is there. The general disgruntlement among men is there. This mainstream forum is exposing a lot of truth, even if the original article falls victim to typical feminist censorship. Has it been taken down, for that matter?

The only thing that has been demonstrated is the irrefutable presence of the lace curtain. That fact alone will cause many intelligent men to think about this issue.

08-25-2006 08:36 PM

Re: Congratulations women
Back2TheKitchen
Regular Contributor
Back2TheKitchen

Antiriad wrote:
They have won nothing. The sentiment is there. The general disgruntlement among men is there. This mainstream forum is exposing a lot of truth, even if the original article falls victim to typical feminist censorship. Has it been taken down, for that matter?

The only thing that has been demonstrated is the irrefutable presence of the lace curtain. That fact alone will cause many intelligent men to think about this issue.

I’d also encourage men to read the following:

Why Marriage Has Become a Raw Deal for Men

http://tinyurl.com/mdnd4

“With women or the female mindset imparted through feminization on the vast majority of society, it will be very easy to control the Empire…I mean…the republic.” – mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com

08-25-2006 09:11 PM

Re: Congratulations women
yohan
Contributor
yohan

This article of Forbes was read million times on the internet, causing comments in newspapers and on TV.

This subject might have been an alert for many men to reconsider their opinion about women and their relationship in future.

What can you do about US-feminism:

1- Reject ANY American woman, keep off any private relationship with her.

2- US-laws, which are totally in favor of women (regardless if the wrongdoing is on his or her side) justify the above step (1)

3- Look for a foreign wife, stay single, move out of the US for retirement….there are alternate solutions – there is no need to look for an American girl.

08-25-2006 11:50 PM

Re: Congratulations women
RazorBoy
Newbie
RazorBoy

I mentioned this on my own post, but here it is again:

The fact that women have gone completely hysterial over a FACT-BASED article proves once and for all they are not fit for board rooms or elected office.

I don’t really agree the philosophical gist of Noer’s article (because I think compromises can be made), but I think his facts tell a story.  And no one censors the zillions of man bashing articles, commercials and Tv shows.

08-26-2006 02:47 AM

Re: Congratulations women
ajosselyn
Contributor
ajosselyn

Where is the apology? i didn’t see one. I’m interested.

08-26-2006 04:23 AM

Re: Congratulations women
yohan
Contributor
yohan

<RazorBoy
… don’t really agree the philosophical gist of Noer’s article (because I think compromises can be made), but I think his facts tell a story.  And no one censors the zillions of man bashing articles, commercials and Tv shows.>
——————————————————————
This article conflicts directly with feminist ideology.
Feminists are telling us since decades, that marriage is a form of slavery, and radical feminists even want to abolish marriage.

However if you, a man, say, you do not want to marry them, all hell breaks loose, this is sexual harrassment.

Double standard….

08-26-2006 07:23 AM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Congratulations women

Re: Congratulations women
Pete
Regular Contributor
Pete

RazorBoy wrote:
I mentioned this on my own post, but here it is again:

The fact that women have gone completely hysterial over a FACT-BASED article proves once and for all they are not fit for board rooms or elected office.

Women are in fact weak creatures with inferior capabilities relative to men.

They are by nature too emotional-based, lack rational thinking, and are too easily subject to capricious behavior. This female nature is not congruent with the mental and physical capabilities required to maintain a modern, functioning western society.

And because of this female nature, women are inferior in those ways that matter in the practical world – which is precisely why they are not fit for board rooms or elected office.

Message Edited by Pete on 08-26-2006 08:39 AM

08-26-2006 07:25 AM

Re: Congratulations women
Pete
Regular Contributor
Pete

yohan wrote:

What can you do about US-feminism:

1- Reject ANY American woman, keep off any private relationship with her.

2- US-laws, which are totally in favor of women (regardless if the wrongdoing is on his or her side) justify the above step (1)

3- Look for a foreign wife, stay single, move out of the US for retirement….there are alternate solutions – there is no need to look for an American girl.

Yes, this is probably the best solution right now for American men looking to get married.

The damage caused by the women’s movement is incalculable – it will take at least several generations to heal and correct the horrible mistakes made by women and their male helpers.

In the meantime, for the man looking for a wife or female companionship, it is best to ignore and shun these generally worthless creatures (i.e., American women), and instead look to foreign, non-westernized women.

08-26-2006 07:47 AM

Re: Congratulations women
Pelican
Regular Contributor
Pelican

The fact that women have gone completely hysterial over a FACT-BASED article proves once and for all they are not fit for board rooms or elected office.

The problem with the article is that it’s bad journalism. The studies he drew from were largely sociological studies, which is fine, but Noer tended to couch the results in a very biased way that did not reflect the true intent of the research. He imposed cause where the studies largely didn’t.

Most of his results were presented in an unbiased manner, mind you — the author does actually have a point in that men should not marry a woman who thrives in a career and then expect that there will be a magical change in that same woman five years later when he’d like a housewife. But he spoilt that very cogent angle with a bunch of editorialising and misleading phrasing that honestly come off as “career women are you to trick you, and also too stupid to know how miserable they’ll be”.

Shoddy journalism — even for an op-ed, which usually has looser rules. Certainly not the sort of quality I’d expect from Forbes, especially given that its target audience includes many of those self-same career women, and so an op-ed would be expected to provide all angles of any set of statistics.

It’s just a bad job of editing on a hack article that distressingly seems to have been written by a high-ranking writer/editor with an anti-working-woman bias — as proven by his “Economics of Prostitution” article. Which Forbes does have to think of; when the author has written not one, but TWO articles that compare women to chattel to be managed, you have to wonder if he’s a good fit for a magazine that caters to both male and female executives.

(For the record, I’d love to see an article about compromise in marriage, reflecting the way changing social circumstances affect choice of mate or expectations. Possibly also dealing with the change of attitude from the live-to-work attitude attributed to Boomers and the work-to-live attitude exhibited by the latest generation to enter the workforce. This could’ve been that article, but Noer went for tabloid journalism and blanket generalisation instead. Shame.)

Message Edited by Pelican on 08-26-2006 08:21 AM

08-26-2006 08:20 AM

Re: Congratulations women
Bobby61557
Visitor
Bobby61557

Does the Dont date him girls.com thing ring a bell to a hypocrit like you?

08-26-2006 10:44 AM

Re: Congratulations women
Pelican
Regular Contributor
Pelican
Hypocrite? How do we arrive there?

And I’ve heard of the site but never used it. Pretty good judge of character and picky about which men I date in the first place. Besides which, the anonymity of the internet makes dishonesty and elaboration too easy. It’s not a resource that I’d find reliable.

Why? Are you on it? Link us!

08-26-2006 11:10 AM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: