Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship

Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
RazorBoy
Newbie
RazorBoy

The interesting thing about the “career women” article wasn’t so much the article itself, but the fact that American women simply could not emotionally or intellectually handle an article that was based on facts. So they had it pulled.  One wonders if American women can be trusted with any “facts,” or if they’re too emotionally self-centered to grasp anything anymore. How can we trust them in the board rooms (or in elected offices) if they can’t grasp facts without hysteria?

We’ve let women into colleges, where they have enacted speech codes. We let women in the workplace, where they enacted draconian sex harrassment policies. Now we’ve let women start to control the media.  A **bleep**-centric world is a repressive, Victorian world, as we are learning. “Facts” were stmnied in that society too.

I urge men who are reading this stuff for the first time to bone up on how to deal with feminists. Because instead of logically arguing points, they call you names. They say you “can’t get a woman” or you’re “frustrated” or “disgrunted” that “you must be gay” (of course, if they want to become Lesbians, then it’s OK, because that’s them being “liberated”).  The sign of poor intellect is one who can’t argue a point and resorts to taunts and insults.

Men built the entire Western world — everything women use was built by men. When will we stop it with the outdated Christian chivalry and take this country back?

08-26-2006 02:38 AM

Re: Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
Xasthur_Within
Contributor
Xasthur_Within

RazorBoy wrote:
The interesting thing about the “career women” article wasn’t so much the article itself, but the fact that American women simply could not emotionally or intellectually handle an article that was based on facts. So they had it pulled.  One wonders if American women can be trusted with any “facts,” or if they’re too emotionally self-centered to grasp anything anymore. How can we trust them in the board rooms (or in elected offices) if they can’t grasp facts without hysteria?

We’ve let women into colleges, where they have enacted speech codes. We let women in the workplace, where they enacted draconian sex harrassment policies. Now we’ve let women start to control the media.  A **bleep**-centric world is a repressive, Victorian world, as we are learning. “Facts” were stmnied in that society too.

I urge men who are reading this stuff for the first time to bone up on how to deal with feminists. Because instead of logically arguing points, they call you names. They say you “can’t get a woman” or you’re “frustrated” or “disgrunted” that “you must be gay” (of course, if they want to become Lesbians, then it’s OK, because that’s them being “liberated”.  The sign of poor intellect is one who can’t argue a point and resorts to taunts and insults.

Men built the entire Western world — everything women use was built by men. When will we stop it with the outdated Christian chivalry and take this country back?

What is also significant if an article was written about how career men were insensitive to women’s needs, contained a several-point structure about how to change (for women, of course), emasculated men in the process with bad jokes and snide remarks, and even outright stated how ‘uncool’ men were to women and society in general if they didn’t live up to this particular article, the piece would have never been yanked. Furthermore, any protest would be considered as an indicator of either ‘whining,’ unmanly, or cast to the realm of “Oh, those angry single men who can’t get a date and live in their momma’s basement should just grow up” . . . and no serious criticism would be examined.

Public and media oriented male bashing is the norm, and encouraged. Just PERCEIVED attacks against females is breaking societal code, and often considered as hatemongering even if done in jest. And a real critique of women’s behavior, even if not specifically anti-woman, seems to be a threat and even excised from differing mediums.

Congrats, feminists. You won by bullying and censorship. Happy now?

08-26-2006 03:36 AM

Re: Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
tomshh
Regular Contributor
tomshh

Congrats, feminists. You won by bullying and censorship. Happy now?
——————————————–

The feminists have won so far, but….

When the feminists win, men lose, and women get DESTROYED.

Good work women, way to support a group set to destroy you.

08-26-2006 03:48 AM

Re: Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
Antiriad
Regular Contributor
Antiriad

tomshh wrote:
Congrats, feminists. You won by bullying and censorship. Happy now?

——————————————–

The feminists have won so far, but….

When the feminists win, men lose, and women get DESTROYED.

Good work women, way to support a group set to destroy you.

This is a point that bears repeating.

Men are the guardians of a functioning society. When they decide to turn their backs on it, it soon falls into disarray. No society with men as losers survives for long. Also, very few men exist at the top of the heap and they cannot possibly do the work of the 10 other men who have become disgruntled with the system and are no longer interested in participating.

Doubt my words? See for yourself:

Men Not Working, And Not Wanting Just Any Job

08-26-2006 09:29 AM

Re: Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
Pelican
Regular Contributor
Pelican

Men are the guardians of a functioning society. When they decide to turn their backs on it, it soon falls into disarray. No society with men as losers survives for long. Also, very few men exist at the top of the heap and they cannot possibly do the work of the 10 other men who have become disgruntled with the system and are no longer interested in participating.

Doubt my words? See for yourself:

Men Not Working, And Not Wanting Just Any Job

Antiriad, what is the significance of that article for you? All I can see is a group of men (60% of whom are single) who have decided to gamble with their futures by refusing to do whatever it takes to get by and instead rely on loans or disability. Which isn’t going to end well for them, as the article also makes clear.

In a true example of irony, the ones keeping these irresponsible men out of trouble largely seems to be the women who DO go out and get those unsavoury jobs to support them. And thus, women are keeping the family’s head above water when the man decides to sit home and read all day, rather than get a patch of freelance work or a low-wage, bill-paying job.

In other words: when men start to punk out, women step up and do what needs to be done. Not exactly a stellar example of a collapsing system.

Or was your intention in posting that article to claim that these picky men aren’t able to get their high-paying jobs because women have taken them? In which case, let me quote the applicable parts of the article:


Even as more men are dropping out of the work force, more women are entering it. This change has occurred partly because employment has shrunk in industries where men predominated, like manufacturing, while fields where women are far more common, like teaching, health care and retailing, have grown. Today, about 73 percent of women between 30 and 54 have a job, compared with 45 percent in the mid-1960’s, according to an analysis of Census data by researchers at Queens College. Many women without jobs are raising children at home, while men who are out of a job tend to be doing neither family work nor paid work.

Women are also making inroads in fields where they were once excluded – as lawyers and doctors, for example, and on Wall Street. Men still make significantly more money than women, but as women become more educated than men, even more men may end up out of the work force.

How does this article support your cause?

Message Edited by Pelican on 08-26-2006 10:08 AM

08-26-2006 10:06 AM

Re: Where There’s Women, There’s Censorship
sunji
Contributor
sunji

“We’ve let women into colleges, where they have enacted speech codes. We let women in the workplace….”

LMAO at “let”. We got there ourselves because like it or not, women have the same rights as men. Quit whining and get over it.

08-26-2006 06:01 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: