I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously

I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
Diogetrix
Regular Contributor
Diogetrix

After reading through a bunch of these posts and getting what I think is a feeling for the general attitudes and the level of debate – which is difficult as hell because this is obviously an emotion driven topic being discussed in a totally unstructured and informal venue by people of all backgrounds and with diverse agendas and degrees of credibility – I think some workable hypotheses are warrented: American women are fat and angry, and they think it must be someone else’s fault and should be someone else’s problem.

09-06-2006 03:25 PM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
Doc_Savage
Regular Contributor
Doc_Savage

So what’s your answer to the problems then?

09-06-2006 05:00 PM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
Diogetrix
Regular Contributor
Diogetrix

Actually, I thought my answer was an editorial alusion to the fact that no one seems to know the question.

09-06-2006 07:05 PM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
Pete
Regular Contributor
Pete

So what’s your answer to the problems then?

Reject them and let them die off alone. Encourage other men to do the same.

09-06-2006 07:31 PM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
MartianBachelor
Regular Contributor
MartianBachelor
“American women are fat and angry, and they think it must be someone else’s fault and should be someone else’s problem.”

That would be in accord with a theory I’ve formulated that just about everything a feminist says about men is some sort of warped projection, that they’re really talking about themselves in a sense. Give the idea a try and maybe see if you don’t start noticing it too.

Anyway, yea, you won’t see any babes on the front lines of the women’s movement. The know they got the power and they like the system just the way it is with them up on a very high pedestal. So when feminists talked about taking women down off of pedestals they were talking about taking the babes down a notch.

This suggests it’s a female-female competition side effect, with the sore losers attacking what they can’t have and might plausibly be envious of. The women who are pretty much out of the mating game have nothing to lose by denouncing heterosexuality in its entirety, criminalizing the male role in it, and all the rest since it doesn’t have any effect on them. This is why some of the response has to come from the women who lose in this dynamic. It’s those private school girls who want to repeal women’s suffrage in the video who we need to wise up and teach to fight back. Instead, the feminist studies professors are getting to `em before we are.

(And, yes, the varous organizations have gotten media savvy and have made an effort to put better looking women in front of the cameras.)

But I don’t know, and who really cares anyway?
Sounds good to me.

______________________________________________
“The loudest, most strident voices calling women weak, stupid, and incapable of competing in the world at large are the feminists.” – zed the zen priest

09-06-2006 07:55 PM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet

This is going to cost anyone who takes my advice pain for the benefit of enlightenment, but..

Put ‘Andrea Dworkin’ into images.google.com and this assertion will be verified.

But, please, brace yourself before you do it and be prepared to quickly click the back button on your browser when you take the jump.

It may sound like I’m joking, but I’m dead serious about the warning here.

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

09-07-2006 01:47 AM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
tellafriend
Regular Contributor
tellafriend

“OF THE American feminists who came to prominence in the 1960s and early 1970s, Andrea Dworkin was the fiercest. There were others horrified and outraged by violence against women, but she went further: “Intercourse with men … means remaining the victim, forever annihilating all self-respect.” She loathed pornography, feeling that it legitimised and promoted rape. A law she co-authored for the city of Indianapolis treated pornography as a violation of civil rights (the law was later overturned). Not coincidentally, she was an expert in the writings of the Marquis de Sade.”

…obituary of a super model. VERY SEXY. The prototypical feminist.

09-07-2006 03:29 AM

Re: I Think I Have the Answer – Seriously
MartianBachelor
Regular Contributor
MartianBachelor
Hey, she was pretty much right about one thing…

“Sexism is the foundation on which all tyranny is built.”
– Andrea Dworkin

Of course she wasn’t talking about feminazism because she was under the illusion that only men could be sexists. Just another case of projection

Anybody who wants a real electroshock treatment to the brain should try reading a book by her partner John Stoltenberg (co-founder of Men Against Pornography); I think “Refusing to be a Man” is the classic self-loathing work in modern american literature, if you can call it literature. Anyway, it details exactly where rad-fems would like men to be, if they decide to allow us to survive.

______________________________________________
“The loudest, most strident voices calling women weak, stupid, and incapable of competing in the world at large are the feminists.” – zed the zen priest

09-07-2006 10:57 AM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: