LOL at the feminists


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – LOL at the feminists

LOL at the feminists
tomshh
Regular Contributor
tomshh

I have not visited this board in a while, but the feminists who constantly repeat themselves saying “fine marry a woman from another country, we will not miss you” are still here desperately trying to change these very same men’s minds and marry an Ameriskank.

Marriage has ALWAYS been as beneficial, if not MORE beneficial for women.  Was a woman going to go work 12 hour days, of manual labor, lifting 100 lbs., in the 1930’s?  NO.

These women were not “slaves” they were living the only life they could live at the time.  There were not lazy ass HR jobs, sit on your a**, eat a bagel, talk to you friends all day, and call it “a day in the office”.

So men advance society so far, that women are allowed to play-play equals (even though they fail miserably).  So do women thank them?  NO.  They whine, b*tch, moan, and make everything one sided.  Now there is NO reason to marry a woman in the USA (Ameriskank). NONE.

And career women are the bottom of the totum pole of the Ameriskanks.  What man in his right mind wants to take all the risks involved in a marriage in the USA, to marry some unhappy woman?  Why?  Why???!!!???  So we men can work all day, to come home to more work, because you wife wants to play play.  Who the f*ck wants to put up with this?

Then the stupid tw*ts make, in most cases, less than the man, but spend WAY more.  You know, she needs a 15th pair of high heels, so she can go play-play at work, and you can come home and scrub the kitchen floor.

What man in his right mind would want this?

09-09-2006 04:13 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
PatriarchVerlch
Regular Contributor
PatriarchVerlch

The truth of the matter is, elite men invented and continue to fund feminism. Just follow the paper trail.

Women have been proving for the last 30 years that men have been right for the last 30 centuries!
http://www.verlch.blogspot.com

09-09-2006 06:31 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
Cassius
Regular Contributor
Cassius
That is no big surprise, all the money had to come from somewhere. You see, capitalism is NOT about getting rich capitalism works fine, when only 2% or so get rich. The rest must be kept poor in order to accept labour. This can be achieved through crisis like the one seen in 1929, however the risks are too high. How do you keep a family from thriving accumulating a fortune over generations, without a destructive war or a risky global depression ? Easy. Women. Women spend money everybody knows it. WOmen do not invest wisely everybody knows that. Women do not plan ahead everybody knows it. Today we have

1. A society that advertises love and most of all marriage to girls in the media.

2. The same society however plants unhappiness and even hate for hubby in the heads of the wife and idea of entitelments high goals and high expectations that can never be achieved leading to depression and unhapiness in the wife resulting in..

3. Divorce as much money as possibel is given to the woman who spends all of it as she gets with the result that

Divorced children have hardly any money to fall back on. Instead of climbing up the social ladder and accumulating a fortune over generations rendering work obsolete the children have to start over, with a 50% chance that their children will have to start over and an over 70% chance that their grandchildren will have to start over. Feminism makes sure that there will be enough poor people, enough working Joes to do the 70 hours week and pick up the thrash despite living in an utopia with opportunity. Feminism is actually needed to fuel capitalism with human capital. Just do not be the one to get burned. Do not fight it, the way you wouldnt teach an less than average intelligent 20 something that there are better jobs than beeing a soldier where you get shot at. Just take the best COA for yourself. The “must work for child support or else he will go to jail” man could turn out to be your best employee. As for you live the good life accumulate that cash marry a good wife, maybe outside America, and try to be on the recieving end of women spending frenzies and men forced to accept work due to obbligations.

09-09-2006 08:30 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
Freeyourself
Regular Contributor
Freeyourself

Cassius wrote:
That is no big surprise, all the money had to come from somewhere. You see, capitalism is NOT about getting rich capitalism works fine, when only 2% or so get rich. The rest must be kept poor in order to accept labour. This can be achieved through crisis like the one seen in 1929, however the risks are too high. How do you keep a family from thriving accumulating a fortune over generations, without a destructive war or a risky global depression ? Easy. Women. Women spend money everybody knows it. WOmen do not invest wisely everybody knows that. Women do not plan ahead everybody knows it. Today we have

1. A society that advertises love and most of all marriage to girls in the media.

2. The same society however plants unhappiness and even hate for hubby in the heads of the wife and idea of entitelments high goals and high expectations that can never be achieved leading to depression and unhapiness in the wife resulting in..

3. Divorce as much money as possibel is given to the woman who spends all of it as she gets with the result that

Divorced children have hardly any money to fall back on. Instead of climbing up the social ladder and accumulating a fortune over generations rendering work obsolete the children have to start over, with a 50% chance that their children will have to start over and an over 70% chance that their grandchildren will have to start over. Feminism makes sure that there will be enough poor people, enough working Joes to do the 70 hours week and pick up the thrash despite living in an utopia with opportunity. Feminism is actually needed to fuel capitalism with human capital. Just do not be the one to get burned. Do not fight it, the way you wouldnt teach an less than average intelligent 20 something that there are better jobs than beeing a soldier where you get shot at. Just take the best COA for yourself. The “must work for child support or else he will go to jail” man could turn out to be your best employee. As for you live the good life accumulate that cash marry a good wife, maybe outside America, and try to be on the recieving end of women spending frenzies and men forced to accept work due to obbligations.

I’m already cheap so women call me a tight wad. But am I a tight wad or women greedy. I think women are the greedy ones. Like you said they spend spend spend and most of the times you can’t see where the money went. Now in my case I will spend a lot of money sometimes. Like my mountain bike at $1200 but it will last me a lifetime since it was very high quality. Shoes at $100-500 then they want another pair 6 months later. I don’t even have 10 pairs of shoes in the house.

09-09-2006 09:47 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Ahhh, such generalizations. Well, if it makes you feel better to take a huge, diverse group, and lump it into such simple terms and you feel that this is a correct description of every woman in the US who has a career, have at it.

I will tell you that there are PLENTY of exceptions to your rule.

09-09-2006 10:00 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
Cassius
Regular Contributor
Cassius
Well men spend too, Ford gt annyone ? The difference is i spend the money i have. I wouldnt have bought ferraris if 200.000 aint something i can sneeze at. Its aright buying 20 pair of shoes or 40 pair of shoes WHat is that ? 8000 dollars ? Though i would say if you have that much time to shop, its time to get a hobby. How about cooking or sewing. It is not aright to spend ALL the money you have and not plan ahead and tell your kids spending all the money the father payed in alimony and child support was the best you ever did for them.

09-09-2006 10:05 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
porkchops38
Regular Contributor
porkchops38

phatkat811 wrote:
Ahhh, such generalizations. Well, if it makes you feel better to take a huge, diverse group, and lump it into such simple terms and you feel that this is a correct description of every woman in the US who has a career, have at it.

I will tell you that there are PLENTY of exceptions to your rule.

Generalizations are perfectly okay when they are generally true more often than not. Generally, there is not much difference between a career woman and a SAHM in today’s America — both are generally selfish lazy societal leeches trying to selfishly live for themselves and themselves only while living off the backs of men while they themselves do as little work as possible. I’ve seen women in corporate America sleep their way to the top, and i’ve seen SAHM’s sleep their way to a rich husband. Last year, a young race car driver named Erin Crocker signed a huge contract with Ray Evernham, now we find out the Crocker and Evernham have a “personal relationship” and that Ray Evernham’s wife has filed for divorce. Last year Crocker was being touted as the epitome of a role model for young girls — yes just follow what Crocker does — sleeps her way to the top. I’ve also seen sexist discrimination against men, where companies that deal with the federal government have to have “affirmative action” programs giving preferential treatment to women in hiring and promotions. When I wanted to start my own business, I went to the SBA and was told in no uncertain terms that I do not qualify for any of the special low interest loans from the SBA because I didn’t have a vag1na, among other discriminations against me. In the end, these women leeches in America today always get screwed. Either the SAHM’s end up lonely and miserable when their kids and ex hate them, or the “career women” end up getting screwed by wasting the money they stole from getting paid at jobs they don’t work at because they were simply hired to fill an affirmative action quota. I know “career women” who are so stupid they have gone to car dealerships and paid full sticker price for a new car because they thought car-shopping was like shoe-shopping — you pay the sticker price! LMAO! So, I know in a capitalistic system, there are many men who appreciate feminism and career women because such has helped them bilk billions of dollars out the hands of these allegedly “strong, smart, independent” career women! LMAO! Women keep chasing after feminist ideals like it is a pot-of-gold, but they will only find at the end of their lives that it was really only a pot-of-dung. It’s almost like Eve in the Garden of Eden, only took the serpent about 2 minutes to sell Eve out of paradise and into a sh1t hole!

Here’s an audio clip of today’s typical “career women” when “negotiating” to get her car fixed….

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/mechanic.html

09-09-2006 10:52 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
tomshh
Regular Contributor
tomshh

Yes, there is one way I support feminism.

See, there is no way in hell I would marry one of these bottom of the barrel, worthless, USA sh!t women.  No chance in hell.  So these worthless pile of crap, knock to the human race, will never get anything out of me.

But my hobby is investments.  In fact my goal is to be an indepently wealthy invester by 35/40 years old.  I am well on target.

And I realize that thanks to feminism, giving women the ability to be “independent” (LMAO) actually is in fact…

Feminism gave women the ability to become financial slaves to men like myself.

Thanks feminism.  Thanks to feminism there is no pressure for me to marry these worthless women, I get MORE sex staying single, and I can retire young, move overseas, and marry a REAL woman.

Thank you feminists

09-09-2006 02:00 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
MartianBachelor
Regular Contributor
MartianBachelor
phatkat811 – glad to see you’re back around these parts; I have your icon ready for you:

Yes, you’re correct that there is a sense in which all generalizations are lies. I think those who deal with abstractions on a daily basis (typically males) have this instilled in them early on, so the caveat doesn’t necessarily need repeating. We know you all are special, each and every one of you darlings.

Cassius – that’s a novel and interesting take on things. You may very well be onto something: let the silly little things think whatever nonsense they want, just so long as they don’t stop shopping; a woman’s inalienable right to choose is her inalienable right to make choices as a consumer – just so long as she keeps making them, the merry-go-round keeps spinning and throwing off money for the carnival builders and operators.

I suppose if feminists really wanted to bring down the evil capitalist patriarchal system, all they’d have to do is organize women to all go on a prolonged shopping strike. I can foresee them having a problem getting this idea to “take”.

______________________________________________
“The loudest, most strident voices calling women weak, stupid, and incapable of competing in the world at large are the feminists.” – zed the zen priest

09-09-2006 02:14 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
PatriarchVerlch
Regular Contributor
PatriarchVerlch

phatkat811 \

It’s not a generalization. Divorced women are the poorest group of all, even with the so called advancement of throwing money at them!!!!

Women have been proving for the last 30 years that men have been right for the last 30 centuries!
http://www.verlch.blogspot.com

09-09-2006 03:48 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – LOL at the feminists

Re: LOL at the feminists
sweetesthailey
Visitor
sweetesthailey

Tomshh that’s way too harsh.

09-09-2006 11:38 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
Termi0n
Regular Contributor
Termi0n

sweetesthailey wrote:
Tomshh that’s way too harsh.

Uh oh, I think she’s got a crush on ya.

Women want fried ice. -Arab Proverb

09-10-2006 01:19 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
tomshh
Regular Contributor
tomshh

Not sure what is “too harsh”, but for me personally, feminism has been a GREAT thing.

Feminism will hurt WOMEN MORE THAN men.  This is common sense, and the dumb tw*ts that blindly support, only go to prove maybe women are inferior.

I love it, I love it.  I am only here to help more men see the light.  Let these women be broke a** b*tches.  Working 3 jobs when they are 50, while you retire at 35.  Use their ignorance against them.  Don’t support them financially, or any other way.  These same women have sh*t on us for TOO long, time to take advantage of their inferiority and ignorance.

Thank you!!!

09-10-2006 03:56 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811

PatriarchVerlch wrote:

phatkat811 \

It’s not a generalization. Divorced women are the poorest group of all, even with the so called advancement of throwing money at them!!!!

The original post said:

-Career women work in easy HR jobs
-Career women go to work just to play-play
-Career women own lots and lots of high heels

That’s a pretty crazy generalization there if you’re asking me. I know plenty of working women (myself included) who are teachers, nurses, and mental health workers, and do it not to dress up and eat bagels at work, but they do it because they love what they’re doing and find it to be extremely rewarding (yeah, I know those aren’t big-shot lexus-buying jobs, but I’ve found that a lot of people would rather be happy than insanely rich). Oh, and you can’t wear heels when you work in any of these jobs – quite impractical when you’re on your feet, and if you end up having to restrain someone.

09-10-2006 09:48 AM

Re: LOL at the feminists
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

The reason they are called generizations is that they are generally true.  Sure, there are exceptions to every situation but they typically tend to be just that, exceptions.   I don’t care what people on the far extremes of either direction say.  It won’t change the fact that I won’t marry and jeopardize my income and asset base by marrying and tilting the advantage toward a woman by doing so.  I am very egalitarian and practical/pragmatic.  I see the lack of logic that many women demonstrate in articulating their position and essentially saying “it’s ok for us, but not for you!”   Just look at Randolph-Macon Woman’s College in Virginia which is going to allow men to attend.  Now, realistically there won’t be very many men who wish to attend but the women are very angry that they will.  Lets reverse that as any all men’s colleges were stormed by women and men were expected to passively accept it, and they did.  Again, what is good for the goose IS truly good for the gander.  Don’t forget this when you make foolish and stupid arguments and statements.  Don’t get upset when these events occur.  Why get married?  There is absoluted no advantage to a man to do so.

09-10-2006 01:16 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
If the generalizations are generally true, then how come they are true for not ONE working woman out of every woman I know? In fact, for every woman that I can think of right now, NONE of those things are generally true.

09-10-2006 01:24 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
ACatInSD
Regular Contributor
ACatInSD

True. There is no need to get married in this modern world. Don’t forget that there are some women think like this as well: in our own home, make decent money and invest wisely so that our asset grows bigger over time, we cannot really think of any benefits to get married.

The point here is that only a small percentage of women think and do so, therefore it doesn’t fit your generalization.

Your post is pretty strong that reinforces my impression about guys like you. I am glad that I have been the same reasonably selfish/self-centered that I don’t need to struggle at the bottom of the society like most other women (especially single mothers) in this contry who mostly still daydream about some prince showing up and doing the rescue.

I hope there are more women would read these posts to stop their daydreaming and wake up as early as possible.

09-10-2006 01:31 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Don’t confuse pragmatism, practicality and logic with being self-centered.  They are distinctly separate. I am all for a level playing field, as long as there is one.  When there isn’t then there is no incentive to engage in certain risky behavior.  Equality must cut across all issues, not just those that benefit women, it true equality is the objective.  If it is merely to create an artificial advantage for a woman, well then I see now how the game is played and I have adjusted my approach accordingly.

09-10-2006 01:37 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Most single mothers are single mothers by choice.  They selected the men who impregnated them, they didn’t use birth control, they made poor choices, they have eliminated job prospects due to their choices, etc.  I have a great girlfriend but I also consciously decided to NOT date single mothers (they are a smart man’s kryptonite) and become involved in their chaos, etc.  I always glove up, but that being said a woman should always use a method of birth control (No, the rhythm method is not a form of birth control!) to insure against unwanted pregnancy and they should be selective about whom they put their ankles behind their heads for.  I don’t feel sorry for single mothers.  They are not superhuman.  Most are stupid and have made poor life choices.   That is their problem.

09-10-2006 01:42 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
ACatInSD
Regular Contributor
ACatInSD

It is the human nature that defines pragmatism, practicality as being reasonably thinking of themselves first, which in their behaviors, would show reasonably selfish and self-centered. Notice the word “resonably” here.

I just feel like I am wasted, that being a woman, I haven’t got any benefits which the government/legal system has ever provided. So I would say there is a change that should be done, that women like me shouldn’t get our reputation ruined by those “bad apples”.

09-10-2006 01:44 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.
Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – LOL at the feminists

Re: LOL at the feminists
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

I agree with you.  Additionally, most people do practice enlightened self interest in their decision making, whether they care to admit it or not.

09-10-2006 01:47 PM

Re: LOL at the feminists
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet

ACatInSD Wrote:

I haven’t got any benefits which the government/legal system has ever provided. So I would say there is a change that should be done, that women like me shouldn’t get our reputation ruined by those “bad apples”.

You know, I agree with you on this one.

In today’s society, it is not permissible to talk about decent female qualities and immoral female qualities because invariably some feminist will claim that it is misogynistic.

Feminists speak for all women. They come from a marxist viewpoint, and want everyone to BE THE SAME.

For example, a repeating pattern on this board is that every now and then a career woman will pop in and say something along the lines of:

I’m am teh strong women! Men can’t handle cougars like me! Why can’t they just BE A MAN and live up to my demands

Then typically about thirty men will respond telling her that as men we’d rather not take orders and prefer pleasant women.

BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY DON’T GET IT! ANOTHER ONE POPS UP BEFORE LONG!!

Consider this: Men will read the rebuttal of the Noer article and think “huh, so women think like this eh? Well they’re all immoral then.” Even though her message is politically correct!!

This is because in society in is unacceptable to talk about women, or put them into separate categories, and so women never realise that men think this way. The only thing that is acceptable is to make blanket generalisations that “all women are lovely” etc.

Frankly this sort of censorship causes no end of problems…

Furthermore, it’s not like immoral women don’t say they are decent and it is “other” women who are not, as well.

Where I live they just had their first prosecution using video camera footage in the main nightspot. A woman was severely bashed.. by two other women.

Those women admitted guilt (it was on camera, so a bit hard to deny), but said “they were very drunk and the attack was out of character because they are both single mothers with children”.

The fact that there is a correlation between their being single mothers and immoral, is so swept under the carpet in the media that they can even claim INNOCENCE based on it. If a man says that single mothers are even a social problem, they are labelled misogynistic.

Your problem was created by modern feminism.

By the way, everybody does do what is in their self-interest. The people that say they don’t are trying to manipulate other people into doing something. The only difference there is whether they admit it or not.

P.S.

I still think you haven’t really had enough contact with western culture to understand what we are talking about fully.

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

09-10-2006 09:05 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: