Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin

Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
leeraconteur
Regular Contributor
leeraconteur

This is no accident.  Any webmaster worth their salt knows how to properly maintain a page like this.

Gentlemen, this is what we are up against.  Not only do they disagree with us, they don’t want us to be able to communicate, share our opinions, our arguments.

Nothing less than censorship and prior approval of our posts and opinions would be acceptable to them.

08-30-2006 04:02 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
DontMarryNoer
Regular Contributor
DontMarryNoer

Erm, I’m not a gentleman and don’t agree with Noer but the same thing is happening to me. In fact, I keep getting amessage saying an HTML isn’t valid and it has to be approved due to language or something.

HELP, HELP! I’M BEING OPPRESSED!

08-30-2006 04:24 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet
LOL owned! Didn’t I tell you these guys are just whiny pussies?

08-30-2006 05:00 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
DontMarryNoer
Regular Contributor
DontMarryNoer

AngryMuppet wrote:
LOL owned! Didn’t I tell you these guys are just whiny pussies?

They’re certainly something. Conflating criticism with censorship, fighting straw-arguments… But it is funny to watch.

08-30-2006 05:03 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet
Yeah, I got the same error you did as well. Curiously, I didn’t just jump to the conclusion that feminists were somehow censoring me. But then, I’m not walking around in fear of women (sorry, I meant “American women”) all day. Talk about telegraphing your insecurities.

I’ve said it before, but I wish all my suspects were like these guys. My life would be so much easier if they were.

08-30-2006 05:10 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
PatriarchVerlch
Regular Contributor
PatriarchVerlch

Trying to get in the pants of some feminists I see. Good luck, hope it works!!!!

Women have been proving for the last 30 years that men have been right for the last 30 centuries!
http://www.verlch.blogspot.com

08-30-2006 05:26 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet
Dude, I’ve been married for 13 years.

08-30-2006 05:54 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
leeraconteur
Regular Contributor
leeraconteur

LOL owned! Didn’t I tell you these guys are just whiny pussies?

Nothing worse than a man who insults other men because they don’t want to be some woman’s doormat.

08-30-2006 06:44 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet
I think you should re-read my posts. I’m not blasting you for not wanting to be a doormat. No one should be a doormat in their relationship–man or woman.

I’m blasting you for being whiny little babies who are so scared of the evil “feminazis.”

Reading. It’s Fundamental.

08-30-2006 06:47 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
leeraconteur
Regular Contributor
leeraconteur

They’re certainly something. Conflating criticism with censorship…

Please locate the original article on Forbe’s site.

You cannot – because it was pulled.

Why was it pulled?  Because women at Forbe’s and elsewhere criticised the article.

Let me connect the dots:
-Forbe’s posts article.
-Women and Feminists criticise it.
-Forbe’s pulls article. [this is censorship]
-Forbe’s reposts watered down version, with few research cites.  [censorship due to pressure from women]
-Women and Feminists continue to criticise it.

fighting straw-arguments…

I believe you meant ‘strawman’ arguments.

The only strawman techniques here come from the women and feminists who insult and call names (like our law enforcement friend above), although that is technically a variation on ad hominem.

08-30-2006 06:50 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet
lee, aren’t you going to acknowledge you were wrong about being censored?

08-30-2006 06:52 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
DontMarryNoer
Regular Contributor
DontMarryNoer

Please locate the original article on Forbe’s site.

You cannot – because it was pulled.

Why was it pulled?  Because women at Forbe’s and elsewhere criticised the article.

Let me connect the dots:
-Forbe’s posts article.
-Women and Feminists criticise it.
-Forbe’s pulls article. [this is censorship]
-Forbe’s reposts watered down version, with few research cites.  [censorship due to pressure from women]
-Women and Feminists continue to criticise it.

Yes, Forbes pulled it. Women and feminists criticized it. It isn’t censorship. When people say “feminists censored it” or “feminists wanted it censored” or “feminists were against free-speech”, that isn’t true. Feminists – not mention in general just many men and women – criticized it. Forbes didn’t like it and apparently felt embarrassed. THEY pulled it. Call it censorship or capitalism, Forbes did it themselves because it wasn’t good business. Kind of ironic in a way as this is precisely what settings like Forbes is responsible for (see what you wrought, Forbes?!). But it was Forbes who pulled it. Not its critics. Not those who continue to criticize it. Blame Forbes and capitalism or even censorship. But you can’t blame the feminists who criticized it for censorship (though I’d have asked it be re-written for clarity, but that is just me as an analytical editor and a whole different issue). And continuing to criticize it is not censorship … although it is continually misrepresented as such.

fighting straw-arguments…

I believe you meant ‘strawman’ arguments.

No, because I’m address a whole variety of arguments attributed to people who didn’t make them instead of addressing the perpetrator face-to-face.

The only strawman techniques here come from the women and feminists who insult and call names (like our law enforcement friend above), although that is technically a variation on ad hominem.

All you need to do is read through to see the responses to the criticisms were complete straw-men. But they go way back into the pages, so I’m not surprised if you’re not bothered enough. If it makes it earier and you care enough, click on my name and see someo fthe things I responded to.

And are you going to admit you aren’t being tageted, or what?

Message Edited by DontMarryNoer on 08-30-2006 07:08 PM

08-30-2006 07:07 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Actually, it is you who is whiny **bleep** girlyman and would be easy to beat down, quite frankly.  When I was a student at a major military academy and an officer/pilot after graduation I dealt with many a desk jockey wanna be man such as you and provided them same insight into their inner woman but kicking their *ss.  You would be much easier being so skilled in pc and propaganda.  In short you are lickspittle.

08-31-2006 11:21 AM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Actually, it is you who is whiny **bleep** girlyman and would be easy to beat down, quite frankly.  When I was a student at a major military academy and an officer/pilot after graduation I dealt with many a desk jockey wanna be man such as you and provided them same insight into their inner woman but kicking their *ss.  You would be much easier being so skilled in pc and propaganda.  In short you are lickspittle.

08-31-2006 11:22 AM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet

moneyneversleep wrote:
Actually, it is you who is whiny **bleep** girlyman and would be easy to beat down, quite frankly.  When I was a student at a major military academy and an officer/pilot after graduation I dealt with many a desk jockey wanna be man such as you and provided them same insight into their inner woman but kicking their *ss.  You would be much easier being so skilled in pc and propaganda.  In short you are lickspittle.

Really? What branch of the service? I come from a military family myself. We include three officers (Navy and USAF) and a SEAL and have served in three wars. One of my brothers is still on active duty, along with several of my buddies, who are active-duty Marines.

Hell, one of my Marine buddies is a hard-core right-winger with two Iraq tours under his belt and one Afghanistan tour. Nonetheless, he adores his wife and dotes on her and wants her to be happy (she’s a professional woman herself). Do you think he’s lickspittle, too?

Ultimately, I don’t care if you were a soldier or not, or where you went to college, or whether you have a desk job. What matters to me is character. It doesn’t take much character to threaten, cajole, and insult people you’ve never met and will never meet.

08-31-2006 12:07 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Don’t equate character with being stupid, which you seem to view as a prequalification.  Again, this is why we don’t allow law enforcement to make moral or legal judgements, as they are note qualified and seem to have significant problems with their own morality and conformance with the law.

08-31-2006 12:28 PM

Re: Note The Constant Attempt At Censorship Via the Attache on The Right Hand Margin
AngryMuppet
Regular Contributor
AngryMuppet

moneyneversleep wrote:
Don’t equate character with being stupid, which you seem to view as a prequalification.  Again, this is why we don’t allow law enforcement to make moral or legal judgements, as they are note qualified and seem to have significant problems with their own morality and conformance with the law.

Where did I equate character with being stupid? If that was meant to be a pithy insult, I didn’t get it.

And it’s not my job to make moral or legal judgements, and thank goodness for that, because it’s a job I don’t want. My job is to find out the truth, nothing more.

You know, I can tell you’re trying to insult me, but you’re not doing a particularly good job. Tellafriend has it down pretty well, though, and I suggest his posts as a guide for you. Try using words like “mangina” to make you sound clever. Calling me “biotch” will establish your “street cred” and make you sound like an actual badass. Make sure to also question my sexuality; calling people who disagree with you a “faaaag” is the ultimate insult! You might also try suggesting that my wife keeps my balls “in her purse,” since calling someone you’ve never met “pussywhipped” immediately makes you appear more masculine, intelligent, and courageous than you might otherwise be perceived.

08-31-2006 12:55 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: