Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey

Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
PatriarchVerlch
Regular Contributor
PatriarchVerlch

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/

Long Read, but very informative. You can observe how feminism is trying to transform the world. The voting patterns of women, who tend to vote for bigger government, more hand outs, more police, more social services, more welfare, the hive mentality, or the herd mentality, but in the end men pay more taxes, fathers are disenfranchised as the state assumes the role of surrogate, unaffectionate fatherville.

Look at what women vote for, no guns. Only the criminals get guns, so we are even less save. Disengage fathers from the head of the family, increase criminal activity by lack of a strong masculine leader in the family. What does frog in the well feminists do? Increase taxes to try and solve the problem. The problem would be easily fixed by empowering the family.

What do we care, our population is dwindling, soon the old will burden the young for social services, medicare, and a host of other handouts we wouldn’t need if the elite were not stripping our wealth at every turn.

That last question begs an answer. With women empowered and men brow beaten to give them a head start, is the government suppose to fear women who cannot lift 25 lbs without a struggle? Prepare to get stream rolled.

Women have been proving for the last 30 years that men have been right for the last 30 centuries!
http://www.verlch.blogspot.com

09-04-2006 11:38 PM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Back2TheKitchen
Regular Contributor
Back2TheKitchen
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/09/western-feminism-and-need-for.html

“With women or the female mindset imparted through feminization on the vast majority of society, it will be very easy to control the Empire…I mean…the republic.” – mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com

09-05-2006 01:06 AM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Pete
Regular Contributor
Pete
Years from now, the term “female suffrage” will be looked upon by many as symbolic of failure, stagnation, decline, deluded irrationality, and widespread human suffering.

The women’s movement has now become a self-destructive and terrible crime against humanity. And as a result, it will completely destroy the position of women in many western cultures.

The venomous and selfish narcissism of western women eventually will reach a point of impasse when dramatic change becomes a necessity, not an option.

And then there will be hell to pay. And it will be western women who will be paying the entire bill, in the currency of shame, blame, and recompense.

The elimination of women from the democratic process will eventually happen – because it must happen. In fact, when it does happen, it will be administered in a particularly unpleasant fashion due to the terribly destructive consequences of the women’s movement.

Message Edited by Pete on 09-05-2006 03:56 AM

09-05-2006 01:44 AM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet

Years from now, the term “female suffrage” will be looked upon by many as symbolic of failure, stagnation, decline, deluded irrationality, and widespread human suffering.

The women’s movement has now become a self-destructive and terrible crime against humanity. And as a result, it will completely destroy the position of women in many western cultures.

The venemous and selfish narcissism of western women eventually will reach a point of impasse when dramatic change becomes a necessity, not an option.

And then there will be hell to pay. And it will be western women who will be paying the entire bill, in the currency of shame, blame, and recompense.

The elimination of women from the democratic process will eventually happen – because it must happen. In fact, when it does happen, it will be administered in a particularly unpleasant fashion due to the terribly destructive consequences of the women’s movement.

Awesome post! Truly nail smack right on the head. Sad thing is, it is almost inevitable. They can’t change. They are driven to do what feels good in the moment, and entitlements grabbing feels good in the moment for the majority. With this behaviour constantly escalating and men becoming increasingly non-cooperative in footing the bill only to be “rewarded” with greater oppression, it is hardly sustainable.

When the end comes it will be truly horrifying.

p.s.

Greater taxes has always been an inevitable indicator of the downfall of a culture.

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

09-05-2006 02:25 AM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Back2TheKitchen
Regular Contributor
Back2TheKitchen
This is an excellent article!

======================================
One doesn’t have to imagine, Alexis! It’s happening right NOW!

Alexis said…

One wonders what would happen if, in a land where radical feminists are powerful, there evolves a “man’s strike”. That is, imagine if men acted like the women from Lysistrata and refused to court women, refused to work for a living, and refused to fight to defend their country. That is, there would be a “civic mutiny” against the state, where men would refuse to cooperate in their own emasculation.

Not only is falsely accusing all men of rape unfair, but it is the kind of bigotry that encourages men to remain virgins for life. Do Scandanavian women want to become so deprived of companionship that they start hiring gigolos? Do they want their society to become completely sterile?

The historical reason for democracy in the first place is to symbolize the power of a nation at arms. Essentially, it was “one man, one vote, one rifle”. The puzzling aspect of women’s suffrage is how the right to vote has not been accompanied by a desire by women to bear arms.

What radical feminists want isn’t true matriarchy, as matriarchy actually frees men to become more warlike than patriarchy does. (Think of Spartans or plains Indians…) No, what radical feminists seem to want is the emasculation of men!

======================================

What are liberal feminists going to do when faced with aggressive gang of Muslim youngsters? Burn their bras and throw the pocket edition of the V*gina Monologues at them?

Even though women can take steps to protect themselves, the primary responsibility for protection will probably always belong to men. Women will thus only have as much freedom as their men are willing and capable of guaranteeing them. It is a major flaw in many feminist theories that they fail to acknowledge this.

The difference between women’s rights and women’s illusions is defined by a Smith and Wesson, not by a Betty Friedan or a Virginia Wolf.

The elaborate welfare state model in Western Europe is frequently labelled as “the nanny state,” but perhaps it could also be named “the husband state.” Why? Well, in a traditional society, the role of men and husbands is to physically protect and financially provide for their women. In our modern society, part of this task has simply been “outsourced” to the state, which helps explain why women in general give a disproportionate support to high taxation and pro-welfare state parties. The state has simply become a substitute husband, upheld by taxation of their ex-husbands.

It should be mentioned that if this welfare state should for some reason cease to function (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1234), for instance due to economic and security pressures caused by Muslim immigration, Western women will suddenly discover that they are not quite as independent from men as they like to think. In this case, it is conceivable that we will se a return to the modern traditional “provide and protect” masculinity, as people, and women in particular, will need the support of the nuclear and extended family to manage.

To sum it up, it must be said that radical feminism has been one of the most important causes of the current weakness of Western civilization, both culturally and demographically. Feminists, often with a Marxist world view, have been a crucial component in establishing the suffocating public censorship of Political Correctness in Western nations. They have also severely weakened the Western family structure, and contributed to making the West too soft and self-loathing to deal with aggression from Muslims.

Message Edited by Back2TheKitchen on 09-05-2006 08:58 AM

“With women or the female mindset imparted through feminization on the vast majority of society, it will be very easy to control the Empire…I mean…the republic.” – mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com

09-05-2006 11:57 AM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
tellafriend
Regular Contributor
tellafriend

Would I trust a child to drive a car, defend a nation or decide its fate?

I would never trust a woman with a vote.

This concept has nothing to do with sexism. Back then, men just weren’t pussified emasculated shadows of real men. They understood that women were too stupid to decide the fate of the world.

Would you put a gun in the hands of a child and expect it to act responsibly with it?

Neither did our wise founding fathers ever dare to put a vote in the hands of a woman.

09-05-2006 03:09 PM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
MartianBachelor
Regular Contributor
MartianBachelor
…a “man’s strike”.

Sorta like this?

Someone I knew once followed the logical implication of the radical feminist’s proposal to just about entirely do away with men. It’s a real sci-fi dystopia.

The women themselves would eventually split into roughly two groups, the girly women and the manly womyn. The latter are needed because someone still needs to haul the garbage, mine the coal, lay the asphalt, and fight off the invaders trying to break in and take everything by force. It always reminds me of the saying about Alaska being “where the men are men, and the women are too”…

Eventually, you’d end up back about where we are now, with the much-maligned “social division of labor” re-established — except that the manly womyn would be more likely to revolt and otherthrow their slave-masters than men are because they wouldn’t have the natural proclivities to protect and provide for the girly women (why would they even agree to do it in the first place?), the natural tendency men have to want to gain their favor. Basically, the girly charms women use on men would be ineffective on the manly womyn.

While more “equality” and “fairness” (which are male invented abstractions) was being worked out in endless committees and negotiating sessions (after the inevitable strike), the system collapses because the needed work isn’t getting done in the meantime. So, as usual, the radical feminist program would end up making things much worse for everyone.

Regardless of who does it, what we now think of as being the male role is essential to making the world go round in anything resembling it’s current state. It’s time the larger society started paying attention to that aspect of the infrastructure and its maintenance. It ignores it at its own peril.

______________________________________________
“The loudest, most strident voices calling women weak, stupid, and incapable of competing in the world at large are the feminists.” – zed the zen priest

09-05-2006 03:32 PM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet

The women themselves would eventually split into roughly two groups, the girly women and the manly womyn. The latter are needed because someone still needs to haul the garbage, mine the coal, lay the asphalt, and fight off the invaders trying to break in and take everything by force.

Yes yes yes.

At female-only universities there have been demonstrations against the MANLY WOMEN that so many feminists glorify becoming. Their exact problems with them are the same problems with us. It’s frickin ludicrous.

What you said above is more real than that. Evolutionarily we all started out androgynous. Nature decided to separate us into sexes, as soon as that was done, one sex specialised in one thing, the other in another. The ones that survived were the best at those specialisations, thus creating the differences.

If women wiped out the entire male population and genetically engineered future children to be androgynous… WE’D INEVITABLY BE BACK EVEN THEN HAHAHAHA

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

09-05-2006 10:53 PM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
MartianBachelor
Regular Contributor
MartianBachelor
“At female-only universities there have been demonstrations against the MANLY WOMEN that so many feminists glorify becoming.”

Say what?!

What are the dear princesses getting their makeup all messed up over?

Can’t we all just get along?

______________________________________________
“The loudest, most strident voices calling women weak, stupid, and incapable of competing in the world at large are the feminists.” – zed the zen priest

09-05-2006 11:23 PM

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
shovel
Regular Contributor
shovel
The elimination of women from the democratic process will eventually happen – because it must happen. In fact, when it does happen, it will be administered in a particularly unpleasant fashion due to the terribly destructive consequences of the women’s movement.

Awww, dementia can be so adorable.

09-06-2006 03:24 AM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey

Re: Western Feminism and the Need for Submission by Baron Bodissey
Pete
Regular Contributor
Pete

shovel wrote:.

Awww, dementia can be so adorable.

American women today are very demented, and that has consequences. They have made their bed, and they will have to lie in it.

09-06-2006 02:15 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: