To Arms! To Arms!


Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – To Arms! To Arms!

To Arms! To Arms!
Mamonaku
Regular Contributor
Mamonaku
Gentlemen:

I am sure you have seen the article on Yahoo News about Married Couples being in the Minority.

The time has come for us to blow this thing wide open.

On the discussion section of this article, there are well over 7000+ posts in a matter of hours.

We need to attract new blood! We need to reach out and educate the masses.

I have, for the last six hours, been posting the link to my blog
http://www.mamonaku187.blogspot.com.

Gentlemen, I suggest you do the same! We need to be where the action is. We need to let men know that MRAs are out here and active.

To Arms!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061015/ts_alt_afp/afplifestyleussociety

Mamonaku out.

10-16-2006 09:33 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet

Thanks Mamonaku!!

Looks like the next big one. This forum has become almost entirely anti-feminist and I’m getting edgy for new blood. I’m there. I love these “tell feminists where to go” forums recently. They’re the best. That board is just like this one was two months ago. It’s got so much traffic it’s like a chat room. Awesome!

I’m posting there under the nick ly7erus.

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-16-200610:26 PM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-16-2006 10:00 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Have fun playing on the internet, boys. As much as you complain about women who go to work and never get anything done, some of you spend a heck of a lot of time posting here.

10-16-2006 10:18 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Mamonaku
Regular Contributor
Mamonaku
whats up Phatkat??

Have you been to my blog? It’s a lot of laughs I promise!

10-16-2006 10:22 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Page not found – Error 404. Buahahaha! Hilarious!!

Nah, in reality, blogspot seems to be down entirely. I’ll try again later.

10-16-2006 10:53 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
It’s up and there’s nothing wrong with blogspot. My diagnosis of the problem is user retardation.

And there are more hours in the day than what I spend at work, especially for me as I thankfully don’t have to support some dumb biitch, like one who can’t use simple functions of the Internet.

I started a big sh*t storm on there just now anyway. I can’t read all those replies.

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-16-200611:14 PM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-16-2006 11:09 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Mamonaku
Regular Contributor
Mamonaku
Yeah Bullet!

You were giving it to em raw.

Man I think they banned me or something, because I couldn’t reply to any messages after a while. But, in every reply I made, I put the blog address on there.

So hopefully some of the guys will check it out, move on to some of the links, etc etc.

It was awesome to team up with ya!

Peace.

10-16-2006 11:24 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Nope, it’s back now. I must say that Happy’s getting oh-so-clever with his replies. Oh well, let him act like he’s happy with the internet as his only companion and/or hobby outside of work. What a meaningful and productive life!

10-17-2006 12:00 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Actually, there is some good, intelligent discussion going on after you guys left, and the woman’s rights crowd has some good things going for them. Pity, Happy (not so much you mamo, I admit you are more rational and are mostly there to plug your blog anyway), you may have to take some vacation time, stock up on the red bull, and do a 24/7 stakeout if you want to keep that from happening.

10-17-2006 12:42 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
PhatKat you’re a patent moron as usual.

You are aware you’re saying this on the Internet right?

Look at the screen infront of you.. the Internet… get it you dumb biitch?

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-17-2006 01:36 AM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – To Arms! To Arms!

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
HappyMom
Regular Contributor
HappyMom
I’m chorofrahab over there.

It always cracks me up when one messageboard poster tells another messageboard poster they are online too much. You do realize that you can’t do that with any credibility, don’t you fatbat?

10-17-2006 01:43 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Happybullet, is your life that meaningless and futile?   It would appear so.  I don’t like feminist extremists either but I have a life and don’t feel compelled to spend my waking moments pursuing them.  Then again, I am not collected welfare as you are, which allows you much free time when you are not clipping coupons and organizing your food stamps for your next been and chips run.

10-17-2006 11:29 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
Hmm. I drop in occasionally – more this week because I’m sick and putting some non-relaxing things on hold. Some of the men here post over and over and over (mostly cutting and pasting what someone else thought of first), and spend hours on end trying to attack message boards.

And THEN they complain that “women” at work sit there and play on the internet instead of doing real work.

That’s all I wanted to point out.

10-17-2006 11:53 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
tellafriend
Regular Contributor
tellafriend

phatkat811 wrote:
Hmm. I drop in occasionally – more this week because I’m sick and putting some non-relaxing things on hold. Some of the men here post over and over and over (mostly cutting and pasting what someone else thought of first), and spend hours on end trying to attack message boards.

And THEN they complain that “women” at work sit there and play on the internet instead of doing real work.

That’s all I wanted to point out.

What is this stupid biitch yapping about now?..

She sounds like the typical dumb biitches who try to justify why they wear so much makeup.. “well you see, I don’t wear as much make up as HER over there.. yeah I only use mascara, foundation, blush and eye shadow.. she also uses lip gloss and toner!!!”

Stupid biitch, do you know how incredibly efffing retarded you sound?

Get back in the kitchen and bake yourself another brain cell.

10-17-2006 02:39 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Halladay
Regular Contributor
Halladay

moneyneversleep wrote:

“Happybullet, is your life that meaningless and futile?   It would appear so.  I don’t like feminist extremists either but I have a life and don’t feel compelled to spend my waking moments pursuing them. ”

actually, it would appear that you spend more of your time here than he does judging by the number of posts you make.. 320 and rising.

10-17-2006 05:34 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
Isn’t this blatantly 1 + 1 obvious?

When someone on the Internet attacks someone else for being on the Internet, USING THE INTERNET AS THE MEDIUM TO DO SO, and making all sorts of inferences about how they must be able to do it and claiming that those same inferences don’t apply to themselves, they are stupid and have zero credibility. It’s that simple.

FatBat is one of the most incredibly stupid, delusional women I’ve encountered. There’s no apparent incentive for her to post (if we’re to believe her little stories). She gets smacked down on every thread she participates in on this board and keeps coming back for more punishment. Serious mental problems there.

Moneyneversleeps has made some good posts, but looks like he’s losing it over the Christian issue and is willing to side with someone as retarded as fatbat to attack an action orientation in a way that might encourage people to allow feminist extremists to walk all over them just to discredit my sideline comments on the (to my mind irrelevant) matter, which is a ridiculous failure to prioritise correctly.

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-18-200602:52 AM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-17-2006 08:48 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
1. I’m not an extremist.

2. Half the threads I’ve posted to end up abandoned, with my post being the last one. I haven’t seen myself get “slammed” with good arguments once. A crazy amount of insults, perhaps, but names don’t mean too much to me.

10-18-2006 08:29 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
moneyneversleep
Regular Contributor
moneyneversleep

Both you guys need to get a life and quit masturb*ting to internet porn, get an education, get out of the garage where you are changing oil, and get a life.

10-18-2006 09:26 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
tellafriend
Regular Contributor
tellafriend

phatkat811 wrote:
1. I’m not an extremist.

2. Half the threads I’ve posted to end up abandoned, with my post being the last one. I haven’t seen myself get “slammed” with good arguments once. A crazy amount of insults, perhaps, but names don’t mean too much to me.

3. You’re a stupid incoherent delusional biitch who is an insult to any intellectual discussion.

Now go fetch your stick you dumb biitch

10-18-2006 07:17 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
Isn’t looking at the TIME people post a wonderful thing?

Somehow I knew, when I posted last night, that after I got HOME FROM WORK today, I would somehow have posts waiting for me from people chastising ME for posting on the Internet during working hours.

And FatBat, if you can’t see you’ve been annihilated on this forum then you’re even more mental than I thought, I just thought you were a masochist or something. Even though I knew you were stupid, I guess I underestimated the extent.

I dunno, you do realise you’re a complete idiot for your little Internet use accusation now right? You got smacked down pretty badly in THIS thread…

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-18-200608:32 PM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-18-2006 08:31 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Reader Response to “Don’t Marry Career Women” – To Arms! To Arms!

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
I wasn’t working when I posted that. I was sick and bored. Went back to work today – lookee – no posts!

10-18-2006 10:18 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
You stupid lying biitch.

Anyone can look at the timestamp and go oh look, can’t have gone back to work today and been sick and bored at the same time.

Well, physically sick anyway. I’m sure you could be mentally sick and at work.. is that what you are saying? .. because it makes sense.

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-18-2006 11:02 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Diogetrix
Regular Contributor
Diogetrix

While I understand and admire your spirit, I can’t share your optimism. It’s been over twenty five years since I first tried to raise the consciousness of a group of men who were being hoodwinked by a bunch of feminists – it was over control of programming and administration of a non-profit radio station. I lost. The men who identify as liberal are mostly mystified about the meaning of liberalism and freedom; they think women are exactly the same as men, even though they know that’s stupid. So, the men who want to be enlightened and progressive end up being duped by women. I don’t think there is a solution in organizing the masses of men – they’ll just roll their eyes and think you a weirdo, and the females will drive a wedge any time they can work on vulnerable men’s hormones – which is most of the time. The men who are aware of the realities are mostly walking wounded, and their age (mostly over 40) makes us unable to communicate with young men. Females have developed the mind control angle of ‘bitter old man,’ and many other tactics to make young men suspicious of us older guys. There is reason enough for younger men to be defensive and withdrawn – they have young sexy babes around them, and there is bound to be tension when older, wiser men are there. The females know very well how to exploit that kind of dynamic. ‘Oh, honey – let’s go somewhere and get away from that old guy – there’s something creepy about him. OK, baby?’
I think society must be in great pain before there can be enough men and women who will push for a change in the status quo, and right now that means women dominating men.

10-18-2006 11:10 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811

Happy_Bullet wrote:
You stupid lying biitch.

Anyone can look at the timestamp and go oh look, can’t have gone back to work today and been sick and bored at the same time.

Well, physically sick anyway. I’m sure you could be mentally sick and at work.. is that what you are saying? .. because it makes sense.

What are you talking about?? I was sick and bored yesterday (and at home, not work, because nobody needs me coughing to the point of gagging on them), and today I went to work at 10 and posted well before that. Would you like a copy of my timecard?

And when you’re resorting to trying to figure out what hours I work, I think you have far from slammed me in this debate.

Edit: Also just realized the timestamp appears to be from a time zone three hours from mine. Didn’t think of that, didja?

Message Edited by phatkat811 on 10-18-200611:18 PM

10-18-2006 11:14 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
FatBat you are very obviously one stupid lying biitch.

You very obviously claimed to be sick when you made that post and that you had not made any posts today. “I went to work today – lookee no posts”.

Now you backtrack and say it was *just* before you went to work today.

I guess that 10 o’clock start is either another lie or must be the result of flexitime or some other such b.s. that lazy, self-centred biitches like you get, but it doesn’t change that fact that you lied when you claimed to have not made any posts today, WHEN YOU HAD.

Therefore YOU ARE A LIAR.

This is in addition to being a pretty nasty piece of work who needs to take a very serious look at herself.

Am I now going to have to look forward to some such B.S. as “well I was sick until 10 o’clock then I suddenly got better and went to work”.

You are a liar. You have been caught but you are still trying to get out of it like a spoilt child. You are a dishonest piece of trash.

Capisce?

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-18-200611:42 PM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-18-2006 11:40 PM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
Dio!!

In my late 20s, I’m on the borderline between “younger guy” and “older guy”. You might also be surprised to know that a lot (around 50%) of MRAs on the Internet are in their 20s.

The “youth MRA” problem is a weird one. It is also frustrating because they are the easiest for golddiggers to dupe into marriage, unsafe sex (and later child support) etc.

Despite bucking to feminists more as a result of being fresh out of politically correct school, raised by single mothers and eager to compete with other men for sex, younger guys are actually MORE misogynistic than older guys.

That’s the problem. What convinces one group won’t convince the other and vice versa. A serious political MRA site that tries to be gender egalitarian can undermine it’s effectiveness by having content which would appeal to the younger generation.

At the same time younger guys would be even more against feminism if they were actually educated as to what it was about.

Here are some of the things that motivate younger guys against feminism: Objectification of women, getting laid tactics (PUAs), humorous misogyny that simply denigrates women and anti-radical humour such as South Park.

I’d say that the sort of stuff mentioned there is already handled pretty well. What we have to do is make a LINK between that and being a more serious MRA. Feminists would make it easy for us if they tried to crack down on it too much. In fact, what they have already done to crack down on it is a link.

MGTOW is another decent link.

http://www.mgtow.net

The Internet has had the effect of creating a PUA community AND an MRA community. There are links between the two. I’d say the Internet is the major difference between now and 25 years ago.

That and that we are already further down the line on the destruction of marriage. That state of affairs leaves things wide open for the elimination of chivalrous attitudes. This can be sold to younger men on the virtue of not being “pussywhipped” or a “symp”, or simply advising them that a chivalrous attitude is a display of being a “beta” and will encourage a woman to use you for attention and/or rape you financially rather than get you laid. Just present it as advice on getting laid, which will be the only thing women are good to them for. It’s not like it’s a lie. If it wasn’t I don’t think there would be MRAs. Anyway that lays the groundwork for them later becoming an MRA.

If chivalry is destroyed enough to affect public policy, feminism is dead. We only really need a majority of men to do this. Even if 100% of women are against it, the battle will be between MRAs and the few remaining chivalrous men as women can’t fight like men. 10 men would rout 1,000 women in direct confrontation.

The funny thing is, after feminism is gone chivalry would return and society would start to work again. Women would probably be treated better than they are now.

Destroy chivalry so it can return. It’s a weird world. Or rather eliminate unappreciated chivalry. There is historical precedent.

Anyway those are the two main differences between now and 25 years ago. I don’t really need to believe I will win to fight for what I consider to be morally correct, but I am optimistic, that is the reason for my optimism and I would be interested to hear your comments.

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-19-200601:45 AM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-19-2006 01:33 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
phatkat811
Regular Contributor
phatkat811
This is by far the most insane argument I have had lately, but ok….

-Forgot that I had made that post when I first got up. I meant that to say I had made no posts during the workday. Honest mistake; does not mean I’m lying (and why would I lie about that anyway?)

-A 10:00-6:30 shift is the result of working in a field where clients need you around sometimes during hours that are not the normal 8-5 business day, when they themselves are at work. We all put in one swing shift and one late shift as well as a rotating Saturday. I’m new, I’m young, I don’t get the luxury of a consistent schedule for a while. This by no means makes me lazy, as I put in 40 hours a week on top of school.

Now can we please move on to something more productive???

10-19-2006 02:01 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
Happy_Bullet
Regular Contributor
Happy_Bullet
No you retarded biitch.

Even if we ignore that you’ve acted like a dumb biitch on here and go waaay out of our way to give you the benefit of the doubt that you were in fact so moronic you didn’t know you were lying, you’re still a dumb biitch, sh*t communicator and still have no productive reason for being present on this board and certainly not in this thread.

And I’ll remind you, FatBat, that you brought the issue up. So you’re just being dishonest again when you say you want to be more productive. This is the sort of garbage you bring to the table.

Message Edited by Happy_Bullet on 10-19-200604:38 AM

Men have standards. Women will be compared. DEAL WITH IT.

10-19-2006 02:54 AM

Re: To Arms! To Arms!
HappyMom
Regular Contributor
HappyMom
BTW
here is another article on this topic, ‘Marriage and the Professional Woman’

They have a comments section at the bottom for anyone interested but no proper message boards.

Message Edited by HappyMom on 10-19-200603:07 PM

10-19-2006 03:06 PM

==============================================================================
Click on the board or message subject at the top to return.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: